Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101 (2026)
Application for authority to employ deputies
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) Where any one (1) of the clerks and masters of the chancery courts, the county clerks and the clerks of the probate, criminal, circuit and special courts, county trustees, registers of deeds, and sheriffs cannot properly and efficiently conduct the affairs and transact the business of such person's office by devoting such person's entire working time thereto, such person may employ such deputies and assistants as may be actually necessary to the proper conducting of such person's office in the following manner and under the following conditions, namely:
- (1) The clerks of the circuit, criminal, and special courts may make application to the judge, or any one (1) of the judges, of their respective courts, in term time or at chambers, by petition duly sworn to, setting forth the facts showing the necessity for a deputy or deputies or assistants, the number required and setting forth the salary that should be paid each;
- (2) The sheriff may in like manner make application to the judge of the circuit court in the sheriff's county, for deputies and assistants, showing the necessity therefor, the number required and the salary that should be paid each; provided, that in the counties where criminal courts are established, the sheriff may apply to a judge of such criminal court; and
- (3) The clerks and masters of the chancery courts, county trustees, county clerks and clerks of the probate courts, and registers of deeds may make application to the chancellor, or to one (1) of the chancellors, if there be more than one (1), holding court in their county by sworn petition as above set forth, showing the necessity for a deputy or deputies or assistants, the number required and the salary each should be paid.
- (b) In the event a petition is filed by a court clerk, the court shall, upon request of any party, transfer the case to a court other than a court the clerk serves. No order increasing expenditures shall be effective during any fiscal year unless the petition is filed within thirty (30) days after the date of final adoption of the budget for the fiscal year, except this shall not apply to any order entered into by agreement of the parties. A new officeholder shall have thirty (30) days from taking office to file a petition and any order entered with respect to such petition may be effective during the fiscal year.
- (c)
- (1) In the event the county official agrees with the number of deputies and assistants and the compensation and expenses related thereto, as set forth in the budget adopted by the county legislative body, the county mayor and the county official involved may prepare a letter of agreement, using a form prepared by the comptroller of the treasury setting forth the fact that they have reached an understanding in this regard.
- (2)
- (A) This letter of agreement shall be filed in court; however, no court costs, litigation taxes or attorneys fees shall be assessed.
- (B) The clerks of the circuit, criminal and special courts shall file their letters of agreement or other petitions with the judge or any one (1) of the judges in their respective courts;
- (C) The sheriffs shall file their letters of agreement or other petitions with the circuit court; provided, that in counties where criminal courts are established, the sheriff shall file with the criminal court; and
- (D) The clerk and masters, county trustees, county clerks and clerks of the probate courts and registers of deeds shall file their letters of agreement or other petitions with the chancellor or one (1) of the chancellors if there is more than one (1).
- (3) Any county official authorized to file a salary petition pursuant to this section may use this letter of agreement without regard to whether the county official's office operates under the fee system.
- (d) Unless otherwise prohibited by law or rule of the supreme court, any petition or application for the authority to appoint or employ one (1) or more additional deputies or assistants filed pursuant to this chapter shall be heard and determined by a judge or chancellor serving the judicial district in which the petition or application is filed.
- (e) If a judge or chancellor serving the judicial district in which a petition is filed under this chapter recuses himself or herself from presiding over an action under this chapter, the judge or chancellor shall immediately follow the procedures and policies established by the Tennessee administrative office of the courts or Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee governing the recusal of a judge or chancellor.
Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1079, s 1, eff. 7/1/2022.
Acts 1921, ch. 101, § 7; Shan. Supp., § 6428a44; mod. Code 1932, § 10731; modified; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 8-2001; Acts 1993, ch. 348, §§ 1, 2; 1995, ch. 29, §1; 2003 , ch. 90, § 2; 2005, ch. 276, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Boarman v. Jaynes, 109 S.W.3d 286 (Tenn. 2003).
Boarman v. Jaynes, 109 S.W.3d 286 (Tenn. 2003). “OPINION Dianna Boarman, the Clerk and Master for the Washington County Chancery Court, filed a complaint on September 30, 1998, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 8-20-101, et. seq., seeking a pay increase for the three chief deputy clerks working in her office.”
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. Epperson, 284 S.W.3d 303 (Tenn. 2009). “Under T.C.A., §§ 8-20-101, et seq., the official sues for additional aid in performing the duties he is legally bound to perform.”
Dorning v. Bailey, 223 S.W.3d 269 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The Sheriff of Lawrence County filed this action against Lawrence County pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-20-101 seeking additional personnel and funding, some of which the Sheriff had not requested through the budget process.”
Shelby Cnty. Civil Serv. Merit Bd. v. Lively, 692 S.W.2d 15 (Tenn. 1985). “The provisions of T.C.A. §§ 8-20-101 to -112 provide for the employment of deputies and assistants to the sheriff and to certain other county officers, *17 usually referred to as “fee officers.”
STAMSON v. Lillard, 316 S.W.3d 611 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “This appeal involves the application of Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-20-101 et seq. to civil service positions in Shelby County.”
Shelby Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “This appeal involves a Sheriffs petition seeking salary increases for deputies filed pursuant to T.C.A. § 8-20-101 et seq. The Shelby County Deputy Sheriffs Association (Sheriffs Association) and individual named deputies appeal the order of the trial court denying their…”
Marshall v. Sevier Cnty., 639 S.W.2d 440 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1982). “, §§ 8-20-101, et seq., authorize officials, including the clerk and master, to bring suits to compel the county to employ additional deputies and assistants for the proper operation of the office.”
Smith v. Plummer, 834 S.W.2d 311 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). “T.C.A. § 8-20-101 provides in pertinent part as follows: Application for authority to employ deputies.”
Dulaney v. McKamey, 856 S.W.2d 144 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). “This action was brought pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A. § 8-20-101, et seq., seeking court approval of additional funds for part-time help in the office and an increase in the Deputy Clerk and Master’s salary.”
State Ex Rel. Ledbetter v. Duncan, 702 S.W.2d 163 (Tenn. 1985). “This is an appeal from the Chancery Court’s issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the defendants to adopt an amended budget funding salary increases *164 for the deputies sheriff of Morgan County and an additional deputy position, as previously set by the Criminal Court…”
Moore v. Cates, 832 S.W.2d 570 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). “1985, where the Supreme Court held an action for mandamus to be the appropriate remedy for the failure of the county to fund salary increases authorized by the criminal court pursuant to T.C.A. § 8-20-101, 102.) In a proceeding pursuant to Tenn.”
William Dorning, Sheriff of Lawrence Cnty., Tennessee v. Ametra Bailey, Cnty. Mayor of Lawrence Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101 (a) (2002). Pursuant to this dispute resolution provision, “the judiciary is brought into the budgetary fray only in limited circumstances.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101(2) — 2 cases
Smith v. Plummer, 834 S.W.2d 311 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). “T.C.A. § 8-20-101 provides in pertinent part as follows: Application for authority to employ deputies.”
David Ramey, Former Perry Cnty. Sheriff v. Perry Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101(a) — 5 cases
Boarman v. Jaynes, 109 S.W.3d 286 (Tenn. 2003). “OPINION Dianna Boarman, the Clerk and Master for the Washington County Chancery Court, filed a complaint on September 30, 1998, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 8-20-101, et. seq., seeking a pay increase for the three chief deputy clerks working in her office.”
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. Epperson, 284 S.W.3d 303 (Tenn. 2009). “Under T.C.A., §§ 8-20-101, et seq., the official sues for additional aid in performing the duties he is legally bound to perform.”
Shelby Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “This appeal involves a Sheriffs petition seeking salary increases for deputies filed pursuant to T.C.A. § 8-20-101 et seq. The Shelby County Deputy Sheriffs Association (Sheriffs Association) and individual named deputies appeal the order of the trial court denying their…”
Roberts v. Lowe (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Shelby Co. Sheriff v. Julian Bolton (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101(a)(1) — 1 case
Boarman v. Jaynes, 109 S.W.3d 286 (Tenn. 2003). “OPINION Dianna Boarman, the Clerk and Master for the Washington County Chancery Court, filed a complaint on September 30, 1998, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 8-20-101, et. seq., seeking a pay increase for the three chief deputy clerks working in her office.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101(a)(2) — 4 cases
Dorning v. Bailey, 223 S.W.3d 269 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The Sheriff of Lawrence County filed this action against Lawrence County pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-20-101 seeking additional personnel and funding, some of which the Sheriff had not requested through the budget process.”
Shelby Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Gilless, 972 S.W.2d 683 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “This appeal involves a Sheriffs petition seeking salary increases for deputies filed pursuant to T.C.A. § 8-20-101 et seq. The Shelby County Deputy Sheriffs Association (Sheriffs Association) and individual named deputies appeal the order of the trial court denying their…”
William Dorning, Sheriff of Lawrence Cnty., Tennessee v. Ametra Bailey, Cnty. Mayor of Lawrence Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101 (a) (2002). Pursuant to this dispute resolution provision, “the judiciary is brought into the budgetary fray only in limited circumstances.”
Shelby Co. Sheriff v. Julian Bolton (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101(a)(3) — 1 case
Bob Patterson, Tr. of Shelby Cnty., Tennessee v. A.C. Wharton, Jr., Mayor of Shelby Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101(a)(l) — 1 case
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. Epperson, 284 S.W.3d 303 (Tenn. 2009). “Under T.C.A., §§ 8-20-101, et seq., the official sues for additional aid in performing the duties he is legally bound to perform.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-20-101(c)(l) — 1 case
Boarman v. Jaynes, 109 S.W.3d 286 (Tenn. 2003). “OPINION Dianna Boarman, the Clerk and Master for the Washington County Chancery Court, filed a complaint on September 30, 1998, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 8-20-101, et. seq., seeking a pay increase for the three chief deputy clerks working in her office.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.