Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-30-320 (2026)
Calculation of time
✓ current as of May 2026
For purposes of this part and unless otherwise specified in this part, time must be calculated in accordance with § 8-30-407.
Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 655, s 27, eff. 7/1/2022.
Acts 2018, ch. 904, § 4.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1986–2003 · leading case: Bobbitt v. Shell, 115 S.W.3d 506 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
Bobbitt v. Shell, 115 S.W.3d 506 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Appellants contend that the state of Tennessee violated T.C.A. § 8-30-320 and T.C.A. § 8-30-101(a)(7) to the extent that Agriculture used any definition of competitive area different from the definition found in T.”
Coleman v. State of Tenn., 846 F. Supp. 582 (M.D. Tenn. 1993). “) As well, Plaintiff asserts that Defendant violated Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-30-320 by failing to consider affirmative action goals or policies in its determination of which employees’ positions would be eliminated under a Reduction-In-Force [“RIF”].”
Bobby Bobbitt v. Dorothy B. Shell, Comm'r (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Appellants contend that the state of Tennessee violated T.C.A. § 8-30-320 and T.C.A. § 8-30-101(a)(7) to the extent that Agriculture used any definition of competitive area different from the definition found in T.”
State v. Farris, 725 S.W.2d 676 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). “§ 8-30-318; lay-offs, T.C.A. § 8-30-320; suspensions, T.C.A. § 8-30-325; and dismissals, T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.