Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-302 (2026)

Suits against counties for wrongs of deputies - Timing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 451, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Acts 1972, ch. 800, § 2; T.C.A., § 8-833.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Jenkins v. Loudon Cnty., 736 S.W.2d 603 (Tenn. 1987).
Jenkins v. Loudon Cnty., 736 S.W.2d 603 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 6× “The Court then observed that the liability of the sheriff had been shifted to the county to a limited extent: "It is equally clear that [T.C.A. § 8-8-302] authorizes suit against the County based on the acts of a deputy sheriff if, but only if, the deputy is at the time `acting…”
Linkous v. Lane, 276 S.W.3d 917 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 6× “Further there is no specific statement that the non-negligence claim made under Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-8-302 was dismissed. Appellant did not raise the issue of the dismissal of the § 8-8-302 claim on appeal.”
Corder v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 852 S.W.2d 910 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 18× “(Governmental Tort Liability Act), and T.C.A. § 8-8-302 (suits against counties for wrong-doing of deputies).”
Thompson v. Williamson Cnty., Tenn., 965 F. Supp. 1026 (M.D. Tenn. 1997). · cites it 8× “Furthermore, Defendant Williamson County is also sued in this action pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 8-8-302, which provides: “Anyone incurring any wrong, injury, loss, damage or expense resulting from any act or failure to act on the part of any deputy appointed by…”
Erwin v. Rose, 980 S.W.2d 203 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-8-302. In Jenkins v. Loudon County, 736 S.”
Spurlock v. Whitley, 971 F. Supp. 1166 (M.D. Tenn. 1997). · cites it 6× “The Court notes that notwithstanding Monell and its progeny, the County is made specifically liable for the actions of deputy sheriffs under a Tennessee statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-8-302, which provides: Anyone incurring any wrong, injury, loss, damage or expense resulting from…”
Willis v. Barksdale, 625 F. Supp. 411 (W.D. Tenn. 1985). · cites it 5× “Section 8-8-302 provides: "Anyone incurring any wrong, injury, loss, damage or expense resulting from any act or failure to act on the part of any deputy appointed by the sheriff may bring suit against the county in which the sheriff serves provided that the deputy is, at the…”
Buchanan v. Williams, 434 F. Supp. 2d 521 (M.D. Tenn. 2006). · cites it 3× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-8-302. Thus, under this statute, the County remains liable on Plaintiffs state law claims for conversion and intentional inflection of emotional distress and Plaintiffs proof satisfies the requirements of the conversion claim.”
Wilson v. Morgan, 477 F.3d 326 (6th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “After the verdicts were entered, the magistrate judge directed verdicts against the county pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-8-302, in the amount of the damages the jury had awarded to the plaintiffs on their state law claims.”
Cheryl Merolla v. Wilson Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 62× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-302 . Tennessee Code Annotated section 8-8-303 provides a waiver of sovereign immunity for claims raised pursuant to section 8-8-302.”
Seiber v. Cooper, 522 F. Supp. 157 (E.D. Tenn. 1981). · cites it 6× “§ 1988 1 incorporates into federal law T.C.A. § 8-8-302 2 which exposes a county to liability for the acts of deputy sheriffs “acting by virtue of, or under color of his office.”
Matthews v. Pickett Cnty., TN, 136 F. Supp. 2d 861 (M.D. Tenn. 2000). · cites it 6× “Based upon her husband’s prior history of physical and sexual assault, the Circuit Court for Pickett County issued a Protective Order on October 15, 1993 to bar her husband from contacting her and directed all law enforcement officers to arrest her husband in the event that the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-302(a) — 1 case
Griffin, Jr. v. Hunter (W.D. Tenn. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.