Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 9-8-112 (2026)

Final judgments against state employees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1982, ch. 717, § 1; 1983, ch. 68, § 1; T.C.A., § 9-8-220; Acts 1984, ch. 972, § 19; 1985, ch. 105, § 13; 1985, ch. 322, §§ 1, 2; 1995, ch. 260, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: Williams v. State, 139 S.W.3d 308 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
Williams v. State, 139 S.W.3d 308 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, such attorney shall not be considered a state employee for any other purpose including, but not limited to, §§ 9-8-112 and 9-8-307. Tenn.Code Ann. § 8-42-103 (2003) (emphasis added).”
Adkins v. McCartt, 723 S.W.2d 627 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “for any damages, including interest thereon, which are awarded in a final judgment in a civil lawsuit against the employee in a court of competent jurisdiction_” T.C.A., § 9-8-112(a) (Supplement 1985). .”
Tanna Gordon v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “§ 9-8-111 (b)(3) (providing that the State is not liable for loss, damage, or destruction of a motor vehicle if the loss “resulted from the employee’s gross negligence”); Tenn. Code Ann. § 9-8-112 (a)(1)–(2) (providing that the board of claims would pay final judgments for state…”
Glenda Cooper v. State, 106 S.W.3d 688 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “See also Tenn. Code Ann. § 9-8-112 (a) (1999).”
Coker v. State Claims Comm (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 9-8-112 provides in pertinent part as follows: Final judgments against state employees.”
LLoyd Williams v. State (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, such attorney shall -5- not be considered a state employee for any other purpose including, but not limited to, §§ 9-8-112 and 9-8-307. Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-42-103 (2003) (emphasis added).”
Steve Conklin v. State (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, such -5- attorney shall not be considered a state employee for any other purpose including, but not limited to, §§ 9-8-112 and 9-8-307. Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-42-103 (emphasis added).”
Daniel B. Taylor v. State of Tenneessee - Concurring (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, such attorney shall not be considered a state employee for any other purpose including, but not limited to, §§ 9-8-112 and 9-8-307. T.C.A. § 8-42-103(b) (Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 9-8-112(a) — 1 case
Adkins v. McCartt, 723 S.W.2d 627 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). “for any damages, including interest thereon, which are awarded in a final judgment in a civil lawsuit against the employee in a court of competent jurisdiction_” T.C.A., § 9-8-112(a) (Supplement 1985). .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.