Texas Codes

Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 22.101 (2026)

Incorporation Of Certain Organizations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 22.101. INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS. A religious society, a charitable, benevolent, literary, or social association, or a church may incorporate as a corporation governed by this chapter with the consent of a majority of its members. Those members shall authorize the organizers to execute the certificate of formation.

Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 182, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2006.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2023–2024 · leading case: Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion: KP-0444 (Tex. Att'y Gen. 2023).
Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion: KP-0444 (Tex. Att'y Gen. 2023). “070(a) (authorizing a transportation corporation to issue debt); see also TEX. BUS. ORGS. CODE §§ 22.101–.109 (subchapter C, governing the formation and governing documents of a nonprofit corporation).”
Mehran Rahbar, M.D., & Farinaz Arbab, M.D. v. Southampton Civic Club (Tex. App. 2024). “See Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code §§ 22.101 et seq. In 2011, SHCC filed a document entitled “Notice Relating to Deed Restrictions Summary for Southampton Place” (the “Notice”) in the Harris County property records.”
Health Freedom Def. Fund, Inc v. US Freedom Flyers, Inc. (D. Idaho 2024). “” Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. § 22.101 . Based on Counterclaimants’ allegations, the Court finds USFF-Texas has plausibly alleged it is validly formed under Texas law, and thus USFF-Texas has capacity to sue under Rule 17(b) sufficient to survive Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss.”
Health Freedom Def. Fund, Inc v. US Freedom Flyers, Inc. (D. Idaho 2024). “” Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. § 22.101 . Based on Counterclaimants’ allegations, the Court finds USFF-Texas has plausibly alleged it is validly formed under Texas law, and thus USFF-Texas has capacity to sue under Rule 17(b) sufficient to survive Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.