Texas Codes

Tex. Elec. Code § 221.002 (2026)

Jurisdiction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 221.002. JURISDICTION. (a) Except as otherwise provided by this section, the district court has exclusive original jurisdiction of an election contest.

(b) The senate and the house of representatives, in joint session, have exclusive jurisdiction of a contest of a general election for governor, lieutenant governor, comptroller of public accounts, commissioner of the general land office, or attorney general.

(c) The senate has exclusive jurisdiction of a contest of a general or special election for state senator.

(d) The house of representatives has exclusive jurisdiction of a contest of a general or special election for state representative.

(e) The governor has exclusive jurisdiction of a contest of the election of presidential electors.

(f) The court of appeals has appellate jurisdiction of contests originating in the district court.

Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 211, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1986. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 163, Sec. 8, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch.1423, Sec. 6.04, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: McDuffee v. Miller, 327 S.W.3d 808 (Tex. App. 2010).
McDuffee v. Miller, 327 S.W.3d 808 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Tex. Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a) (West 2010).”
Kiehne v. Jones, 247 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a). [4] If a trial court finds that the number of illegal votes is equal to or exceeds the number of votes needed to change the outcome of the election, the court is authorized to void the election without attempting to determine how individual…”
Moore v. Barr, 718 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a) (Vernon 1986).”
City of Houston v. Bryant, 516 S.W.3d 47 (Tex. App. 2017). “See Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 221.002 (a) (West 2010); see id.”
Kenneth Craig Miller v. Gregg Cnty., Texas, 546 S.W.3d 410 (Tex. App. 2018). “” TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 221.002(a) (West 2010).”
City of Sherman v. Hudman, 996 S.W.2d 904 (Tex. App. 1999). “See Tex. Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a) (Vernon 1986).”
Thompson v. Willis, 881 S.W.2d 221 (Tex. App. 1994). “Tex.EleC.Code Ann. § 221.002 (Vernon 1986).”
Reyes v. Zuniga, 794 S.W.2d 842 (Tex. App. 1990). “Donovan 132 After these results were released, Bebe Zuniga timely brought an election contest, under TEX.ELEC.CODE ANN. § 221.002 (Vernon 1986), requesting that the court correct the mistake in the recount and declare, as between herself and Rick Reyes, that she would be the…”
Rey Ortiz v. Luis Manuel Singleterry (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 221.002 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.”
in Re: Bruce Bishop (Tex. App. 2020). “See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. §§ 221.002–.004. The applicability of those protections turns on the question of whether the case fits within the title “Election Contests.”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 221.002(a) — 10 cases
McDuffee v. Miller, 327 S.W.3d 808 (Tex. App. 2010). “Tex. Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a) (West 2010).”
Kiehne v. Jones, 247 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App. 2007). “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a). [4] If a trial court finds that the number of illegal votes is equal to or exceeds the number of votes needed to change the outcome of the election, the court is authorized to void the election without attempting to determine how individual…”
Kenneth Craig Miller v. Gregg Cnty., Texas, 546 S.W.3d 410 (Tex. App. 2018). “” TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 221.002(a) (West 2010).”
Moore v. Barr, 718 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. App. 1986). “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a) (Vernon 1986).”
City of Sherman v. Hudman, 996 S.W.2d 904 (Tex. App. 1999). “See Tex. Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a) (Vernon 1986).”
— Tex. Elec. Code § 221.002(f) — 3 cases
Moore v. Barr, 718 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. App. 1986). “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 221.002(a) (Vernon 1986).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.