Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 1.107 (2026)

Alienation Of Affection Not Authorized

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 1.107. ALIENATION OF AFFECTION NOT AUTHORIZED. A right of action by one spouse against a third party for alienation of affection is not authorized in this state.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1997–2007 · leading case: Veeder v. Kennedy, 1999 SD 23 (S.D. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Veeder v. Kennedy, 1999 SD 23 (S.D. 1999). · cites it 2× “380 (1997); New Jersey, NJStatAnn § 2A:23-1 (West 1987); New York, NYCivRightsLaw § 80-a (McKinney 1992); North Dakota, NDCentCode § 14-02-06 (1997); Oklahoma, OklaStat tit 76, § 8.”

Fitch v. Valentine, 959 So. 2d 1012 (Miss. 2007). “380 (1979); North Dakota, N.D. Cent.Code § 14-02-06 (1983); Oregon, Or.”

Smith v. Smith, 126 S.W.3d 660 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “” Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 1.106. Section 1.107 provides: “A right of action by one spouse against a third party for alienation of affection is not authorized in this state.”

Bland v. Hill, 735 So. 2d 414 (Miss. 1999). “380 (1997); N.J.Stat.Ann., § 2A:23-1(1987); N.Y. Civ.”

Jerry Fitch, Sr. v. Johnny Valentine (Miss. 2005). “§ 36-3-701 (1989); Texas, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 1.107 (1997); Virginia, Va.”

Alvin E. Bland v. Charles W. Hill (Miss. 1997). “, § 2A:23-1(1987); N.Y. Civ.Rights Law, § 80-a (McKinney 1992); N.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.