Texas Codes
Tex. Fam. Code § 101.003 (2026)
Child Or Minor; Adult
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 101.003. CHILD OR MINOR; ADULT. (a) "Child" or "minor" means a person under 18 years of age who is not and has not been married or who has not had the disabilities of minority removed for general purposes.
(b) In the context of child support, "child" includes a person over 18 years of age for whom a person may be obligated to pay child support.
(c) "Adult" means a person who is not a child.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: Deepak Budhathoki v. Kirstjen Nielsen, Secr, 898 F.3d 504 (5th Cir. 2018).
Deepak Budhathoki v. Kirstjen Nielsen, Secr, 898 F.3d 504 (5th Cir. 2018). “See TEX. FAM. CODE § 101.003(a). The only statutory exception is this: "In the context of child support, 'child' includes a person over 18 years of age for whom a person may be obligated to pay child support.”
Providence Health Ctr. v. Dowell, 262 S.W.3d 324 (Tex. 2008). “" See TEX. FAM. CODE § 101.003. As an adult, Lance was not under the legal control or supervision of his parents.”
In Re Munks, 263 S.W.3d 270 (Tex. App. 2007). “On the other hand, Rougeau contends that the trial court retained jurisdiction to issue a contempt order, pursuant to Texas Family Code sections 101.003 and 157.”
Harvey v. State, 123 S.W.3d 623 (Tex. App. 2003). “2004) (defining “child” for Crime Victims’ Compensation Act); Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 101.003 (Vernon 2002) (defining “child,” “minor,” and “adult” for matters affecting parent-child relationship); Tex.”
Black v. Jackson, 82 S.W.3d 44 (Tex. App. 2002). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 101.003(a), (c) (Vernon 1996).”
In the Interest of U.P., a Child, 105 S.W.3d 222 (Tex. App. 2003). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 101.003 (Vernon 2002).”
In the Interest of M.J.M.L., 31 S.W.3d 347 (Tex. App. 2000). “Tex. Fam.Code § 101.003 (Vernon 1996)(“ ‘Child’ or ‘minor’ means a person under 18 years of age who is not and has not been married or who has not had the disabilities of minority removed for general purposes.”
Zheng v. Pogash, 416 F. Supp. 2d 550 (S.D. Tex. 2006). “See Tex. FamlCode Ann. § 101.003(a) (Vernon 1995) (defining a child as someone under 18 years old who is not currently and has not ever been married).”
in Re Mark Thompson, Sr., 434 S.W.3d 624 (Tex. App. 2014). “” See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 101.003 (West 2014); Crocker, 3 S.”
Almendarez v. State, 153 S.W.3d 727 (Tex. App. 2005). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 101.003(a), 261.202 (Vernon 2002).”
Floyd Crocker v. Attorney Gen. of Texas, 3 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. App. 1999). “” Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 101.003 (West 1996).”
in the Interest of D.B.J., a Child, 459 S.W.3d 169 (Tex. App. 2015). “" Tex. Fam. Code § 101.003(b). That definition applies to all of Title 5, including section 154.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 101.003(a) — 8 cases
Deepak Budhathoki v. Kirstjen Nielsen, Secr, 898 F.3d 504 (5th Cir. 2018). “See TEX. FAM. CODE § 101.003(a). The only statutory exception is this: "In the context of child support, 'child' includes a person over 18 years of age for whom a person may be obligated to pay child support.”
Black v. Jackson, 82 S.W.3d 44 (Tex. App. 2002). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 101.003(a), (c) (Vernon 1996).”
Zheng v. Pogash, 416 F. Supp. 2d 550 (S.D. Tex. 2006). “See Tex. FamlCode Ann. § 101.003(a) (Vernon 1995) (defining a child as someone under 18 years old who is not currently and has not ever been married).”
Almendarez v. State, 153 S.W.3d 727 (Tex. App. 2005). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 101.003(a), 261.202 (Vernon 2002).”
Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel (Tex. App. 2019).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 101.003(b) — 3 cases
Deepak Budhathoki v. Kirstjen Nielsen, Secr, 898 F.3d 504 (5th Cir. 2018). “See TEX. FAM. CODE § 101.003(a). The only statutory exception is this: "In the context of child support, 'child' includes a person over 18 years of age for whom a person may be obligated to pay child support.”
In Re Munks, 263 S.W.3d 270 (Tex. App. 2007). “On the other hand, Rougeau contends that the trial court retained jurisdiction to issue a contempt order, pursuant to Texas Family Code sections 101.003 and 157.”
in the Interest of D.B.J., a Child, 459 S.W.3d 169 (Tex. App. 2015). “" Tex. Fam. Code § 101.003(b). That definition applies to all of Title 5, including section 154.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.