Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE A. GENERAL PROVISIONS · CHAPTER 107. SPECIAL APPOINTMENTS, CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS, AND ADOPTION EVALUATIONS
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 107.012 (2026)

Mandatory Appointment Of Attorney Ad Litem For Child

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 107.012. MANDATORY APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY AD LITEM FOR CHILD. In a suit filed by a governmental entity requesting termination of the parent-child relationship or to be named conservator of a child, the court shall appoint an attorney ad litem to represent the interests of the child immediately after the filing, but before the full adversary hearing, to ensure adequate representation of the child.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 751, Sec. 15, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 262, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: In re C.L.S., 403 S.W.3d 15 (Tex. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re C.L.S., 403 S.W.3d 15 (Tex. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Family Code Ann. §§ 107.012 (West 2008) (mandatory appointment in State-initiated actions), 107.”
In the Interest of J.R.P., M.C. & R.P., Jr., Minor Child., 55 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. App. 2001). “, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.001 (b) (Vernon Supp.”
C.J.L.G., a Juv. Male v. William Barr, 923 F.3d 622 (9th Cir. 2019). “Despite these background principles, at oral argument, the government refused to concede it would ever be appropriate to appoint counsel in order to have a “full and fair” deportation proceeding, including if a hypothetical two-year-old child were alone in court.”
In the Interest of M.J.M.L., 31 S.W.3d 347 (Tex. App. 2000). “” Tex. Fam.Code ANN. § 107.012 (Vernon 1996)(referring to the hearing required to take place fourteen days after a governmental entity is awarded possession of a child.”
In the Interest of J.A., 109 S.W.3d 869 (Tex. App. 2003). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.012 (Vernon 2002).”
in the Interest of J.M.C., a Child, 109 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App. 2003). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 107.012. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure adequate representation of the child.”
Harris Cnty. Child. Prot. Servs. v. Richker, 2 S.W.3d 741 (Tex. App. 1999). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 107.012 (Vernon 1996) (requiring appointment of attorney ad litem to represent the child in a suit requesting termination of parent-child relationship); Tex.”
In Re Jrp, 55 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. App. 2001). “, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.001 (b) (Vernon Supp.”
In the Interest of E.R., 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App. 2011). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 107.012(a)(2). . The DFPS caseworker testified that appellant tested positive for methamphetamine at the birth of her fourth child on November 1, 2006.”
Faye Comte & Laura Severt v. Smith Cnty. Commissioners Court & Joel P. Baker, Cary Nix, Jeff Warr, Joann Hampton, & Terry Phillips, Each in His or Her Off. Capacity as a Smith Cnty. Comm'r (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “12 Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.012 (Vernon 2014) .”
In Re Ja, 109 S.W.3d 869 (Tex. App. 2003). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.012 (Vernon 2002).”
In Re Jmc, 109 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App. 2003). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 107.012. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure adequate representation of the child.”
Show all 26 citing cases →
— Tex. Fam. Code § 107.012(a)(2) — 2 cases
In the Interest of E.R., 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App. 2011). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 107.012(a)(2). . The DFPS caseworker testified that appellant tested positive for methamphetamine at the birth of her fourth child on November 1, 2006.”
In Re Er, 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.