It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser.
Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
You’re in.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Tex. Codes
» Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE B. SUITS AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · CHAPTER 153. CONSERVATORSHIP, POSSESSION, AND ACCESS
Texas Codes
Tex. Fam. Code § 153.071 (2026)
Court To Specify Rights And Duties Of Parent Appointed A Conservator
Kirk Brand Coburn v. Janet Moreland, 433 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. App. 2014). “Tex. Fam.Code § 153.071 (court required to specify rights and duties of parent appointed conservator); .”
Phillips v. Beaber, 995 S.W.2d 655 (Tex. 1999). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 153.071(3). The decree in the present case provides that Susan alone has “the sole legal right to determine the residence of the child” and “the primary custody and control of the child.”
In the Interest of N.p.m., a Child, 509 S.W.3d 560 (Tex. App. 2016). “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.071 . While the guidelines in the standard possession order are intended to guide courts as to the minimum possession for a joint managing conservator, there is a rebuttable presumption that the standard possession order provides the reasonable minimum…”
In Re Lester, 254 S.W.3d 663 (Tex. App. 2008). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 153.071 (Vernon 2002), § 153.”
in the Interest of D.L.N., E.L.N., & J.L.N., Child. (Tex. App. 2020). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 153.071. “The court may limit the rights and duties of a parent appointed as a conservator if the court makes a written finding that the limitation is in the best interest of the child.”
C. v. v. Texas Dep't of Fam. & Prot. Servs. (Tex. App. 2021). “See Tex. Fam. Code §§ 153.071 (requiring court to specify rights and duties of parents appointed as conservators), .”
In the Interest of B.L.S., a Child v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2023). “Tex. Fam. Code § 153.071. Section 153.134(b) requires an order naming joint managing conservators to allocate rights and responsibilities of the parents and to include provisions to minimize disruption of the child’s education, daily routine, and association with friends.”
Prabhakar Gopalan v. Andrea Marsh (Tex. App. 2025). “” Tex. Fam. Code § 153.071. The Legislature listed several distinct rights and duties of a parent and included a catch-all provision for other rights.”
Phillips v. Beaber, 995 S.W.2d 655 (Tex. 1999). “See Tex. Fam. Code § 153.071(3). The decree in the present case provides that Susan alone has “the sole legal right to determine the residence of the child” and “the primary custody and control of the child.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.