Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 156.405 (2026)

Change In Lifestyle

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 156.405. CHANGE IN LIFESTYLE. An increase in the needs, standard of living, or lifestyle of the obligee since the rendition of the existing order does not warrant an increase in the obligor's child support obligation.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1996–2018 · leading case: In the Interest of J.A.H. & Child., 311 S.W.3d 536 (Tex. App. 2009).
In the Interest of J.A.H. & Child., 311 S.W.3d 536 (Tex. App. 2009). “She testified that over a fifteen month period from the date of the divorce, the living expenses for herself and the children increased from $6,500 a month to $12,000 a month.”
Scott v. Younts, 926 S.W.2d 415 (Tex. App. 1996). “" (now codified at Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 156.405 (Vernon Supp.”
In Re Jah, 311 S.W.3d 536 (Tex. App. 2009). “She testified that over a fifteen month period from the date of the divorce, the living expenses for herself and the children increased from $6,500 a month to $12,000 a month.”
in the Interest of K.F., R.F., & T.F., Child. (Tex. App. 2018). “) (citing Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 156.405 (West 2014)).”
in the Interest of J.A.H. & M.K.H., Child. (Tex. App. 2009). “She testified that over a fifteen month period from the date of the divorce, the living expenses for herself and the children increased from $6,500 a month to $12,000 a month.”
James Joseph Rooney v. Sandra Rooney (Tex. App. 2011). “2d at 417–18; Tex. Fam. Code § 156.405. In determining whether application of the statutory guideline amounts would be unjust or inappropriate, a trial court must consider “the amount of the obligee’s net resources, including the earning potential of the obligee if the actual…”
in the Interest of K.R.A., a Child (Tex. App. 2014). ““An increase in the needs, standard of living, or lifestyle of the obligee since the rendition of the 9 existing order does not warrant an increase in the obligor’s child support obligation,” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 156.405 (West 2008), but in determining whether there has been a…”
in the Interest of K.R.A., a Child (Tex. App. 2014). ““An increase in the needs, standard of living, or lifestyle of the obligee since the rendition of the existing order does not warrant an increase in the obligor’s child support obligation,” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 156.405 (West 2008), but in determining 9 whether there has been a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.