Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE B. SUITS AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · CHAPTER 160. UNIFORM PARENTAGE ACT
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 160.754 (2026)

Gestational Agreement Authorized

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 160.754. GESTATIONAL AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED. (a) A prospective gestational mother, her husband if she is married, each donor, and each intended parent may enter into a written agreement providing that:

(1) the prospective gestational mother agrees to pregnancy by means of assisted reproduction;

(2) the prospective gestational mother, her husband if she is married, and each donor other than the intended parents, if applicable, relinquish all parental rights and duties with respect to a child conceived through assisted reproduction;

(3) the intended parents will be the parents of the child; and

(4) the gestational mother and each intended parent agree to exchange throughout the period covered by the agreement all relevant information regarding the health of the gestational mother and each intended parent.

(b) The intended parents must be married to each other. Each intended parent must be a party to the gestational agreement.

(c) The gestational agreement must require that the eggs used in the assisted reproduction procedure be retrieved from an intended parent or a donor. The gestational mother's eggs may not be used in the assisted reproduction procedure.

(d) The gestational agreement must state that the physician who will perform the assisted reproduction procedure as provided by the agreement has informed the parties to the agreement of:

(1) the rate of successful conceptions and births attributable to the procedure, including the most recent published outcome statistics of the procedure at the facility at which it will be performed;

(2) the potential for and risks associated with the implantation of multiple embryos and consequent multiple births resulting from the procedure;

(3) the nature of and expenses related to the procedure;

(4) the health risks associated with, as applicable, fertility drugs used in the procedure, egg retrieval procedures, and egg or embryo transfer procedures; and

(5) reasonably foreseeable psychological effects resulting from the procedure.

(e) The parties to a gestational agreement must enter into the agreement before the 14th day preceding the date the transfer of eggs, sperm, or embryos to the gestational mother occurs for the purpose of conception or implantation.

(f) A gestational agreement does not apply to the birth of a child conceived by means of sexual intercourse.

(g) A gestational agreement may not limit the right of the gestational mother to make decisions to safeguard her health or the health of an embryo.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 457, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2023 · leading case: Raftopol v. Ramey, 12 A.3d 783 (Conn. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Raftopol v. Ramey, 12 A.3d 783 (Conn. 2011). · cites it 4× “045 (4) (b) (2009); Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 160.754 (b) (Vernon 2008).”
Roman v. Roman, 193 S.W.3d 40 (Tex. App. 2006). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 160.754(g) (Vernon Supp.”
Jerry L. Berwick v. Richard T. Wagner, 509 S.W.3d 411 (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam.Code § 160.754. 5 . These policies favoring stability and finality in parent-child relationships have been recognized by Texas courts rejecting arguments similar to Berwick’s in the same-sex adoption context.”
in the Interest of N.H., a Child (Tex. App. 2022). “” See Tex. Fam. Code § 160.754. Nor did she advocate for any sort 11 of extension of the law regarding presumptive fathers.”
Caroline Michelle Antoun v. Gaby Elias Antoun (Tex. App. 2023). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 160.754 (a). In this case, the court’s judgment did two things: (a) it awarded the embryos to husband, and (b) it divested wife of all right, title, interest, and claim in and to the remaining frozen embryos.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 160.754(b) — 2 cases
Raftopol v. Ramey, 12 A.3d 783 (Conn. 2011). “045 (4) (b) (2009); Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 160.754 (b) (Vernon 2008).”
Jerry L. Berwick v. Richard T. Wagner, 509 S.W.3d 411 (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Fam.Code § 160.754. 5 . These policies favoring stability and finality in parent-child relationships have been recognized by Texas courts rejecting arguments similar to Berwick’s in the same-sex adoption context.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 160.754(c) — 1 case
Raftopol v. Ramey, 12 A.3d 783 (Conn. 2011). “045 (4) (b) (2009); Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 160.754 (b) (Vernon 2008).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 160.754(g) — 1 case
Roman v. Roman, 193 S.W.3d 40 (Tex. App. 2006). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 160.754(g) (Vernon Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.