Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE B. SUITS AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · CHAPTER 161. TERMINATION OF THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 161.211 (2026)

Direct Or Collateral Attack On Termination Order

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 161.211. DIRECT OR COLLATERAL ATTACK ON TERMINATION ORDER. (a) Notwithstanding Rule 329, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the validity of an order terminating the parental rights of a person who has been personally served or who has executed an affidavit of relinquishment of parental rights or an affidavit of waiver of interest in a child or whose rights have been terminated under Section 161.002(b) is not subject to collateral or direct attack after the sixth month after the date the order was signed.

(b) Notwithstanding Rule 329, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the validity of an order terminating the parental rights of a person who is served by citation by publication is not subject to collateral or direct attack after the sixth month after the date the order was signed.

(c) A direct or collateral attack on an order terminating parental rights based on an unrevoked affidavit of relinquishment of parental rights or affidavit of waiver of interest in a child is limited to issues relating to fraud, duress, or coercion in the execution of the affidavit.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 600, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 601, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1390, Sec. 19, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

SUBCHAPTER D. REINSTATEMENT OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AFTER INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 144 cases (26 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: In the Interest of E.R., 385 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In the Interest of E.R., 385 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. 2012). · cites it 3× “” Tex. Fam.Code § 161.211(b). L.R. contends — as did the dissent below— that this bar applies only to parents for whom service by publication is valid.”
Angelica Mitchell Moore v. Donna M. Brown, 408 S.W.3d 423 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013). · cites it 8× “Laws 2108 , 2108 (amended 1999) (current version at Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.211 (West 2008)); Act of May 28, 1997, 75th Leg.”
in the Interest of P.W., a Child v. Texas Dep't of Fam. & Prot. Servs., 579 S.W.3d 713 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2019). · cites it 3× “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.211 (a),(b) (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.”
in the Interest of A.A.S., a Child, 367 S.W.3d 905 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012). · cites it 11× “The trial court dismissed the petition pursuant to Texas Family Code section 161.211, which provides that an order terminating the parental rights of a person who was served with citation by publication generally is not subject to collateral or direct attack more than six months…”
In the Interest of J.W.H., 222 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007). · cites it 3× “If we would not wait for the briefs, as we consistently do when points are untimely or not filed at all, the appellant would still have time to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus or other direct or collateral attack under Texas Family Code section 161.211(a). Tex.”
in the Interest of K.D., a Minor Child, 471 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2015). · cites it 3× “211(c) states, “A direct or collateral attack on an order terminating parental rights based on an unrevoked affidavit of relinquishment of - parental rights or affidavit of waiver of interest in a child is limited to issues related to fraud _” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.211 (c)…”
in the Interest of L.M.I. & J.A.I., Minor Child., 119 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. 2003). “2003); see also Tex. Fam.Code § 161.211(a) (prohibiting direct or collateral attack on order terminating parental rights based on affidavit of relinquishment after six months).”
in the Interest of K.K., L.M., M.M., & T.K., Child., 180 S.W.3d 681 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005). · cites it 2× “Therefore, in a case terminating parental rights, the proceedings should be strictly scrutinized and the involuntary termination statutes strictly construed in favor of the parent. Holick v. Smith, 685 S.”
in the Interest of D.E.H., a Minor Child, 301 S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009). · cites it 6× “A party seeking to overturn a termination order based on an unrevoked affidavit of relinquishment is limited in her attack to arguing fraud, duress, or coercion in the execution of the affidavit, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.211 (c) (Vernon 2008); see In re M.”
In the Interest of D.R.L.M., 84 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 161.211(c). Therefore, TDPRS contends we lack jurisdiction over Kristi’s second issue.”
in the Matter of the Marriage of G.S. & A.G., 555 S.W.3d 301 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2018). · cites it 3× “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 161.211(c) (West 2014).”
Monroe v. Alternatives in Motion, 234 S.W.3d 56 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007). · cites it 2× ““A direct or collateral attack on an order terminating parental rights based on an unrevoked affidavit of relinquishment of parental rights or affidavit of waiver of interest in a child is limited to issues relating to fraud, duress, or coercion in the execution of the affidavit.”
Show all 144 citing cases →
Tex. Fam. Code § 161.211(a): 38 cases
Angelica Mitchell Moore v. Donna M. Brown, 408 S.W.3d 423 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013). “Laws 2108 , 2108 (amended 1999) (current version at Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.211 (West 2008)); Act of May 28, 1997, 75th Leg.”
In the Interest of J.W.H., 222 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007). “If we would not wait for the briefs, as we consistently do when points are untimely or not filed at all, the appellant would still have time to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus or other direct or collateral attack under Texas Family Code section 161.211(a). Tex.”
in the Interest of L.M.I. & J.A.I., Minor Child., 119 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. 2003). “2003); see also Tex. Fam.Code § 161.211(a) (prohibiting direct or collateral attack on order terminating parental rights based on affidavit of relinquishment after six months).”
Brice v. Denton, 135 S.W.3d 139 (Tex. App.—Waco 2004).
in the Interest of K.K., L.M., M.M., & T.K., Child., 180 S.W.3d 681 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005). “Therefore, in a case terminating parental rights, the proceedings should be strictly scrutinized and the involuntary termination statutes strictly construed in favor of the parent. Holick v. Smith, 685 S.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 161.211(b): 9 cases
In the Interest of E.R., 385 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. 2012). “” Tex. Fam.Code § 161.211(b). L.R. contends — as did the dissent below— that this bar applies only to parents for whom service by publication is valid.”
in the Interest of A.A.S., a Child, 367 S.W.3d 905 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012). “The trial court dismissed the petition pursuant to Texas Family Code section 161.211, which provides that an order terminating the parental rights of a person who was served with citation by publication generally is not subject to collateral or direct attack more than six months…”
In the Interest of E.R., 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011).
In re Er, 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011).
City of Magnolia v. Magnolia Bible Church Magnolia's First Baptist Church Believers Fellowship' & Ken Paxton, 629 S.W.3d 471 (Tex. App.—Austin 2020).
Tex. Fam. Code § 161.211(c): 41 cases
In the Interest of D.R.L.M., 84 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 161.211(c). Therefore, TDPRS contends we lack jurisdiction over Kristi’s second issue.”
in the Matter of the Marriage of G.S. & A.G., 555 S.W.3d 301 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2018). “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 161.211(c) (West 2014).”
Monroe v. Alternatives in Motion, 234 S.W.3d 56 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007). ““A direct or collateral attack on an order terminating parental rights based on an unrevoked affidavit of relinquishment of parental rights or affidavit of waiver of interest in a child is limited to issues relating to fraud, duress, or coercion in the execution of the affidavit.”
in the Interest of K.S.L., a Child, 499 S.W.3d 109 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2016).
in the Interest of D.E.H., a Minor Child, 301 S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009). “A party seeking to overturn a termination order based on an unrevoked affidavit of relinquishment is limited in her attack to arguing fraud, duress, or coercion in the execution of the affidavit, Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.211 (c) (Vernon 2008); see In re M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.