Sec. 52.025. DESIGNATION OF JUVENILE PROCESSING OFFICE. (a) The juvenile board may designate an office or a room, which may be located in a police facility or sheriff's offices, as the juvenile processing office for the temporary detention of a child taken into custody under Section 52.01. The office may not be a cell or holding facility used for detentions other than detentions under this section. The juvenile board by written order may prescribe the conditions of the designation and limit the activities that may occur in the office during the temporary detention.
(b) A child may be detained in a juvenile processing office only for:
(1) the return of the child to the custody of a person under Section 52.02(a)(1);
(2) the completion of essential forms and records required by the juvenile court or this title;
(3) the photographing and fingerprinting of the child if otherwise authorized at the time of temporary detention by this title;
(4) the issuance of warnings to the child as required or permitted by this title; or
(5) the receipt of a statement by the child under Section 51.095(a)(1), (2), (3), or (5).
(c) A child may not be left unattended in a juvenile processing office and is entitled to be accompanied by the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian or by the child's attorney.
(d) A child may not be detained in a juvenile processing office for longer than six hours.
Added by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 495, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1991. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1086, Sec. 48, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1297, Sec. 13, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
39
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case:
Vega v. State, 84 S.W.3d 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).
Vega v. State, 84 S.W.3d 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).
· cites it 6× “[4] Now Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a) (2002). [5] Now Tex.”
Dang v. State, 99 S.W.3d 172 (Tex. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “" See TEX. FAM.CODE § 52.025. Finally, in most circumstances, the police do not confine a child in a "jail," but in a "certified juvenile detention facility.”
Vega v. State, 255 S.W.3d 87 (Tex. App. 2008).
· cites it 5× “Specifically, she contends that she was detained more than six hours before the conclusion of her statement, 20 and that she was improperly left unattended in the interview room.”
Anthony v. State, 954 S.W.2d 132 (Tex. App. 1997).
· cites it 4× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025 (Vernon 1996).”
Marsh v. State, 140 S.W.3d 901 (Tex. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “Tex Fam.Code § 52.025(b). 6 .Under Section 52.”
Baptist Vie Le v. State, 993 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “[10] TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 52.025(b)(2) (Vernon 1996).”
Laird v. State, 933 S.W.2d 707 (Tex. App. 1996).
· cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a). This case presents an interesting question on the issue of where a juvenile may be held because appellant was arrested in Pennsylvania, not Texas.”
Pham v. State, 125 S.W.3d 622 (Tex. App. 2003).
· cites it 2× “025(c) specifically provides as follows: "A child may not be left unattended in a juvenile processing office and is entitled to be accompanied by the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian or by the child's attorney.”
Hill v. State, 78 S.W.3d 374 (Tex. App. 2001).
“See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025. Unnecessary Delay Appellant contends that because he was not transported to the police station “without unnecessary delay” as required by section 52.”
In re D.J.C., 312 S.W.3d 704 (Tex. App. 2009).
· cites it 3× “We hold that the warnings given appellant did not substantially comply with the warnings required to advise him of his rights. Thus appellant’s statement was taken in violation of sections 51.”
Smith v. State, 881 S.W.2d 727 (Tex. App. 1994).
· cites it 2× “See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a) (Vernon Supp.”
In Re Djc, 312 S.W.3d 704 (Tex. App. 2009).
· cites it 4× “See TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 52.025(b)(5). Appellant contends that the magistrate who gave him his warnings prior to his electronically recorded statement failed to warn him that his statement could be used "in evidence" against him, in violation of sections 51.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 52.025(a) — 3 cases
Vega v. State, 84 S.W.3d 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).
“[4] Now Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a) (2002). [5] Now Tex.”
Smith v. State, 881 S.W.2d 727 (Tex. App. 1994).
“See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a) (Vernon Supp.”
Laird v. State, 933 S.W.2d 707 (Tex. App. 1996).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a). This case presents an interesting question on the issue of where a juvenile may be held because appellant was arrested in Pennsylvania, not Texas.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 52.025(b) — 1 case
Marsh v. State, 140 S.W.3d 901 (Tex. App. 2004).
“Tex Fam.Code § 52.025(b). 6 .Under Section 52.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 52.025(b)(2) — 1 case
Baptist Vie Le v. State, 993 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
“[10] TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 52.025(b)(2) (Vernon 1996).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 52.025(b)(5) — 3 cases
Marsh v. State, 140 S.W.3d 901 (Tex. App. 2004).
“Tex Fam.Code § 52.025(b). 6 .Under Section 52.”
In Re Djc, 312 S.W.3d 704 (Tex. App. 2009).
“See TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 52.025(b)(5). Appellant contends that the magistrate who gave him his warnings prior to his electronically recorded statement failed to warn him that his statement could be used "in evidence" against him, in violation of sections 51.”
In re D.J.C., 312 S.W.3d 704 (Tex. App. 2009).
“We hold that the warnings given appellant did not substantially comply with the warnings required to advise him of his rights. Thus appellant’s statement was taken in violation of sections 51.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 52.025(c) — 10 cases
Dang v. State, 99 S.W.3d 172 (Tex. App. 2003).
“" See TEX. FAM.CODE § 52.025. Finally, in most circumstances, the police do not confine a child in a "jail," but in a "certified juvenile detention facility.”
Vega v. State, 84 S.W.3d 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).
“[4] Now Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a) (2002). [5] Now Tex.”
Pham v. State, 125 S.W.3d 622 (Tex. App. 2003).
“025(c) specifically provides as follows: "A child may not be left unattended in a juvenile processing office and is entitled to be accompanied by the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian or by the child's attorney.”
Vega v. State, 255 S.W.3d 87 (Tex. App. 2008).
“Specifically, she contends that she was detained more than six hours before the conclusion of her statement, 20 and that she was improperly left unattended in the interview room.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 52.025(d) — 4 cases
Vega v. State, 84 S.W.3d 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).
“[4] Now Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a) (2002). [5] Now Tex.”
Vega v. State, 255 S.W.3d 87 (Tex. App. 2008).
“Specifically, she contends that she was detained more than six hours before the conclusion of her statement, 20 and that she was improperly left unattended in the interview room.”
Laird v. State, 933 S.W.2d 707 (Tex. App. 1996).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.025(a). This case presents an interesting question on the issue of where a juvenile may be held because appellant was arrested in Pennsylvania, not Texas.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.