Tex. Fam. Code § 9.011
Right To Future Property
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 9.011. RIGHT TO FUTURE PROPERTY. (a) The court may, by any remedy provided by this chapter, enforce an award of the right to receive installment payments or a lump-sum payment due on the maturation of an existing vested or nonvested right to be paid in the future.
(b) The subsequent actual receipt by the non-owning party of property awarded to the owner in a decree of divorce or annulment creates a fiduciary obligation in favor of the owner and imposes a constructive trust on the property for the benefit of the owner.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: In Re Presto
In Re Presto (2007)
“The Texas Family Code further provides, “The subsequent actual receipt by the non-owning party of property awarded to the owner in a decree of divorce or annulment creates a fiduciary obligation in favor of the owner and imposes a constructive trust on the property for the…”
National Plan Administrators, Inc. v. National Health Insurance Co. (2007)
“, Tex. Fam.Code § 9.011 (providing that a fiduciary obligation is created when a party receives property that was awarded to a former spouse in a divorce decree); Tex.”
Berger v. Jacobson (In Re Jacobson) (2010)
“Accordingly, this Court looks to Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 9.011 and 9.012 (the Family Code), which provides that: Section 9.”
John Vanderkam v. Melissa Vanderkam (2015)
“” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.011 (b). Despite conceding that ERISA vested the survivor benefit in Melissa, John argues that the divorce decree and this Texas statute entitle him to a declaration that he “has equitable title” to Melissa’s survivor benefit, and that upon receipt of…”
in the Interest of T.F., J.F., L.F., and W.F., Children (2019)
“Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.011 . However, there was no indication in the divorce decree that Mother was awarded funds in the divorce from which to pay the student-loan debt; she was therefore not a constructive trustee or fiduciary subject to contempt for her failure to pay it.”
Schneider v. Schneider (1999)
“See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.011 (West 1998). 2 Here Kay has not actually received any Plan benefits.”
Woolam v. Tussing (2001)
“Current version at Tex Fam. Code Ann. § 9.011 (Vernon 1998).”
Cox v. Cox (In Re Cox) (2003)
“” Texas Family Code § 9.013; “The court may award reasonable attorney’s fees as costs in a proceeding under this subehap-ter.”
Geary H. Lee v. Elizabeth Deanne Holoubek, F/K/A Elizabeth Deanne Lee (2015)
“4 Tex. Fam. Code §9.205 ... ... ... ... .”
Geary H. Lee v. Elizabeth Deanne Holoubek, F/K/A Elizabeth Deanne Lee (2016)
“” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 9.011(b) (West 2006).”
Isabel Pikulin v. Edward Rustlaw Pikulin (2021)
“” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 9.011(b) (West 2020).”
Michelena v. Michelena (2022)
“011 created a “constructive trust,” and plaintiff could not demonstrate that former husband-debtor held an express or technical trust over assets which belonged to her pursuant to a divorce decree); see also In re Atherton, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 39789 , at *7 (holding that “Texas…”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 9.011(b) — 5 cases
In Re Presto (2007)
“The Texas Family Code further provides, “The subsequent actual receipt by the non-owning party of property awarded to the owner in a decree of divorce or annulment creates a fiduciary obligation in favor of the owner and imposes a constructive trust on the property for the…”
Berger v. Jacobson (In Re Jacobson) (2010)
“Accordingly, this Court looks to Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 9.011 and 9.012 (the Family Code), which provides that: Section 9.”
John Vanderkam v. Melissa Vanderkam (2015)
“” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.011 (b). Despite conceding that ERISA vested the survivor benefit in Melissa, John argues that the divorce decree and this Texas statute entitle him to a declaration that he “has equitable title” to Melissa’s survivor benefit, and that upon receipt of…”
Geary H. Lee v. Elizabeth Deanne Holoubek, F/K/A Elizabeth Deanne Lee (2016)
“” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 9.011(b) (West 2006).”
Isabel Pikulin v. Edward Rustlaw Pikulin (2021)
“” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 9.011(b) (West 2020).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.