Sec. 541.061. MISREPRESENTATION OF INSURANCE POLICY. It is an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance to misrepresent an insurance policy by:
(1) making an untrue statement of material fact;
(2) failing to state a material fact necessary to make other statements made not misleading, considering the circumstances under which the statements were made;
(3) making a statement in a manner that would mislead a reasonably prudent person to a false conclusion of a material fact;
(4) making a material misstatement of law; or
(5) failing to disclose a matter required by law to be disclosed, including failing to make a disclosure in accordance with another provision of this code.
Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1274, Sec. 2, eff. April 1, 2005.
SUBCHAPTER B-1. ADVERTISING REQUIREMENTS
Notes of Decisions
Usaa Texas Lloyds Co. v. Gail Menchaca, 545 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 2018).
“46(b)(5), (12) ; TEX. INS. CODE § 541.061(3) - (5) ). The second context in which the benefits-lost rule might apply involves claims based on waiver and estoppel.”
In re Allstate Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., 447 S.W.3d 497 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014).
· cites it 4× “, and Randy Croix made material misrepresentations and misstatements of law related to the insurance policy issued by Allstate to T & R Pipeline that the Briers relied on to their detriment.”
William R. & Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, 515 S.W.3d 21 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2017).
· cites it 2× “Tex. Ins. Code Ann. § 541.061 . State Farm asserted defenses, inter alia, based on the Knoderers’ breach of the intentional acts by the insured 5 and the concealment or fraud by the insured 6 provisions of their policy and for common law fraud.”
In re Lincoln Nat'l Coi Litig., 269 F. Supp. 3d 622 (E.D. Pa. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Tex. Ins. Code § 541.061 (formerly Article 21,21) provides: It is an unfair method of competition or an unfair or' deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance to misrepresent an insurance policy by: (1) making an untrue statement of material fact; (2) failing to state…”
Al Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co., 924 F.3d 776 (5th Cir. 2019).
“Cohen sued on August 14, 2017, 5 asserting (1) breach of contract; (2) misrepresentation of an insurance policy in violation of TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.061 ; (3) fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, and negligent misrepresentation; and (4) false, misleading, or deceptive acts…”
Wyly v. Integrity Ins. Solutions, 502 S.W.3d 901 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016).
“50(a)(3) (West 2011); Tex. Ins. Code Ann. § 541.061 (a)(1), (2), (3) (West 2009).”
Ostrovitz & Gwinn, LLC v. First Specialty Ins. Co., 393 S.W.3d 379 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012).
“by making an untrue statement of material fact, see Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 541.061(1); 2. by failing state a material fact that is necessary to make other statements made not misleading, see id.”
Peacock v. AARP, Inc., 181 F. Supp. 3d 430 (S.D. Tex. 2016).
“052(a); Texas Ins. Code§ 541.061; Texas Ins. Code § 541.”
Tex. Ins. Code § 541.061(1): 8 cases
Ostrovitz & Gwinn, LLC v. First Specialty Ins. Co., 393 S.W.3d 379 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012).
“by making an untrue statement of material fact, see Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 541.061(1); 2. by failing state a material fact that is necessary to make other statements made not misleading, see id.”
Tex. Ins. Code § 541.061(2): 5 cases
Tex. Ins. Code § 541.061(3): 7 cases
Usaa Texas Lloyds Co. v. Gail Menchaca, 545 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 2018).
“46(b)(5), (12) ; TEX. INS. CODE § 541.061(3) - (5) ). The second context in which the benefits-lost rule might apply involves claims based on waiver and estoppel.”
In re Allstate Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., 447 S.W.3d 497 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014).
“, and Randy Croix made material misrepresentations and misstatements of law related to the insurance policy issued by Allstate to T & R Pipeline that the Briers relied on to their detriment.”
Tex. Ins. Code § 541.061(4): 1 case
Tex. Ins. Code § 541.061(5): 1 case
Tex. Ins. Code § 541.061(a): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.