Tex. Codes » Labor Code · TITLE 2. PROTECTION OF LABORERS · SUBTITLE A. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION · CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION
Texas Codes

Tex. Lab. Code § 21.256 (2026)

Statute Of Limitations

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 21.256. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. A civil action may not be brought under this subchapter later than the second anniversary of the date the complaint relating to the action is filed.

Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 9.07(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: In re United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 307 S.W.3d 299 (Tex. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 307 S.W.3d 299 (Tex. 2010). · cites it 2× “” Tex. Lab. Code § 21.256. The Legislature titled the provision “Statute of Limitations,” id.”
Tarrant Cnty. v. Vandigriff, 71 S.W.3d 921 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 21.256 (Vernon 1996).”
Prairie View A&M Univ. v. Diljit K. Chatha, 381 S.W.3d 500 (Tex. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Lab.Code § 21.256. Further, the TCHRA requires a *508 plaintiff to file suit within sixty days of receiving a right-to-sue letter whereas Title VII imposes a deadline of ninety days.”
El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Alspini, 315 S.W.3d 144 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2010). · cites it 6× “” Tex. Labor Code Ann. § 21.256 . Section 21.”
Gordon R. Gross v. City of Houston, 391 S.W.3d 168 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012). · cites it 4× “TEX. LABOR CODE ANN. § 21.256 (Vernon 2006); see City of Houston v.”
Reinaldo Taylor v. Bailey Tool & Mfg. Co, 744 F.3d 944 (5th Cir. 2014). “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 21.256 (West 2006). Taylor’s Title VII claim had to be filed within ninety days of receiving a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC, making his filing deadline for his Title VII claim April 11, 2011, more than eighteen months before he asserted it in his…”
Comptroller v. LANDSFELD, 352 S.W.3d 171 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011). · cites it 2× “3d at 310 ; see Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 21.256 (West 2006); Tarrant Reg'l Water Dist.”
Blaire Reid v. SSB Holdings, Inc., 506 S.W.3d 140 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2016). · cites it 2× “10; see Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 21.256 . Subsequent to Schroeder , the Texas Supreme Court began taking what it characterized as a “modern direction of policy” regarding subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Davis v. Educ. Serv. Ctr., 62 S.W.3d 890 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2001). “Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 21.256 (Vernon 1996).”
Vu v. ExxonMobil Corp., 98 S.W.3d 318 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003). · cites it 2× “The trigger date for the running of [Vu’s] 2-year statute of limitations pursuant to Tex. Labor Code Ann. § 21.256 (Vernon 1996) 1 is found to be the date that [Vu] first filed written paperwork with the Commission, October 30, 1997.”
Roberts v. Padre Island Brewing Co., 28 S.W.3d 618 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2000). “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 21.256 (Vernon 1995); see also Eckerdt, 802 S.”
Lottinger v. Shell Oil Co., 143 F. Supp. 2d 743 (S.D. Tex. 2001). “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 21.256 (“A civil action may not be brought under this sub-chapter later than the second anniversary of the date the complaint relating to the action is filed”).”
Show all 49 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.