Texas Codes

Tex. Lab. Code § 410.209 (2026)

Reimbursement For Overpayment

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 410.209. REIMBURSEMENT FOR OVERPAYMENT. The subsequent injury fund shall reimburse an insurance carrier for any overpayments of benefits made under an interlocutory order or decision if that order or decision is reversed or modified by final arbitration, order, or decision of the commissioner or a court. The commissioner shall adopt rules to provide for a periodic reimbursement schedule, providing for reimbursement at least annually.

Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 955, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 265 (H.B. 7), Sec. 3.198, eff. September 1, 2005.

SUBCHAPTER F. JUDICIAL REVIEW--GENERAL PROVISIONS


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1999–2015 · leading case: Texas Dep't of Ins. v. Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania, 306 S.W.3d 897 (Tex. App.—Austin 2010).
Texas Dep't of Ins. v. Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania, 306 S.W.3d 897 (Tex. App.—Austin 2010). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 410.209 (West 2006).”
In re Tyler Asphalt & Gravel Co., Inc., 107 S.W.3d 832 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003). “Tex Lab.Code Ann. § 410.209 (Vernon Supp.”
Everest Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n, 80 S.W.3d 269 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002). “Laws 3696 , 3697 (now codified at Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.209 (West Supp. 2002)).”
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n The Subsequent Injury Fund & Leonard W. Riley, Jr. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 83 S.W.3d 901 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.209 (West Supp. 2002) (“The .”
Lopez v. Texas Workers' Comp. Ins. Fund, 11 S.W.3d 490 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000). “— Austin 1995, writ denied) (noting that the State has an interest in securing payments to injured workers as quickly as is practical); see also Tex. Lab.Code Ann. §§ 410.209, 413.055 (West Supp.”
Wolford v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 263 S.W.3d 12 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006). “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.209 (Vernon Supp.”
WORKERS'COMP. COM'N v. Cont'l Cas., 83 S.W.3d 901 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.209 (West Supp. 2002) ("The .”
Everest Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n Subsequent Injury Fund Leonard W. Riley, Jr., No. 03-01-00631-CV (Tex. App.—Austin June 21, 2002). · cites it 2× “Laws 3696 , 3697 (now codified at Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 410.209 (West Supp.”
John Crain v. Hartford Ins. Co., No. 03-09-00140-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 18, 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 410.209 (West 2006); see also Wolford v.”
David Evan Schanzle v. JPMC Specialty Mortg. LLC, No. 03-09-00639-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 18, 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 410.209 (West 2006); see also Wolford v.”
Texas Dep't of Ins. v. Ins. Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, No. 03-07-00171-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 12, 2010). · cites it 2× “In two issues, the Division asserts that the district court erred in granting summary judgment because (1) ICSP could not obtain declaratory relief from the district court because "the same issue involved in the declaratory judgment action" was already pending before another…”
Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Noe Portillo, No. 13-10-00470-CV, 2011 WL 2976869 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 21, 2011). · cites it 2× “209, Lumbermens bore the burden to prove that: (1) it was required to pay workers’ compensation benefits by an ―interlocutory order or decision‖ of the Division; (2) it paid benefits under the interlocutory order; and (3) the order was ultimately ―reversed or modified‖ by a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.