Texas Codes

Tex. Lab. Code § 61.062 (2026)

Judicial Review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 61.062. JUDICIAL REVIEW. (a) A party who has exhausted the party's administrative remedies under this chapter, other than a motion for rehearing, may bring a suit to appeal the order.

(b) The suit must be filed not later than the 30th day after the date the final order is mailed.

(c) The commission and any other party to the proceeding before the commission must be made defendants in the suit.

(d) The suit must be brought in the county of the claimant's residence. If the claimant is not a resident of this state, the suit must be brought in the county in this state in which the employer has its principal place of business.

(e) An appeal under this subchapter is by trial de novo with the substantial evidence rule being the standard of review in the manner as applied to an appeal from a final decision under Subtitle A, Title 4.

Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 9.14(b), eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 378 (S.B. 1408), Sec. 13, eff. September 1, 2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Kshatrya v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 97 S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App. 2003).
Kshatrya v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 97 S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 6× “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 61.062 (c) (Vernon 1996).”
Tex-Fin, Inc. & Texas Workforce Comm'n v. Gustavo E. Ducharne, 492 S.W.3d 430 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Lab.Code § 61.062 (West 2015), 2 All parties filed motions for traditional summary judgment.”
Hull v. Davis, 211 S.W.3d 461 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “See TEX. LAB.CODE ANN. § 61.062 (requiring a claimant seeking judicial review of the TWC's preliminary wage determination order to name TWC and any other party proceeding before the TWC as defendants in the suit).”
Texas Underground, Inc. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 335 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 61.062(a)-(e). Section 61.”
Tricon Tool & Supply, Inc. v. Thumann, 226 S.W.3d 494 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 61.062 (Vernon 2006).”
New Boston Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 47 S.W.3d 34 (Tex. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Naples contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because as a matter of law the summary judgment evidence did not constitute substantial evidence to support the TWC Payday Law Decision.”
Tech USA, Inc. v. Evans, 592 F. Supp. 2d 852 (D. Maryland 2009). “See Tex. Lab.Code § 61.062. There are no barriers to Mr.”
Holmans v. Transource Polymers, Inc., 914 S.W.2d 189 (Tex. App. 1996). “Tex.Labor Code Ann. § 61.062(e) (Vernon Pamph.”
Landbase, Inc. v. Texas Emp. Comm'n, 885 S.W.2d 499 (Tex. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “5155 § 5(g) (Vernon 1991) (now codified at Tex.LaboR Code Ann. § 61.062 (Vernon Supp.”
Instrument Specialties Co. v. Texas Emp. Comm'n, 924 S.W.2d 420 (Tex. App. 1996). “Tex.LaboR Code Ann. § 61.062(b) (Vernon Pamph.”
Direct Commc'ns, Inc. v. Lunsford, 906 S.W.2d 537 (Tex. App. 1995). “2d at 831 , see also current codification at TexLabor Code Ann. § 61.062(e) (Vernon 1995)).”
Texas Workers' Comp. Ins. Fund v. Texas Emp. Comm'n, 941 S.W.2d 331 (Tex. App. 1997). “Laws 987,1273 (current version at Tex. LaboR Code Ann. § 61.062 (e) (Vernon 1995)); Potts v.”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 61.062(a) — 3 cases
Hull v. Davis, 211 S.W.3d 461 (Tex. App. 2006). “See TEX. LAB.CODE ANN. § 61.062 (requiring a claimant seeking judicial review of the TWC's preliminary wage determination order to name TWC and any other party proceeding before the TWC as defendants in the suit).”
Texas Underground, Inc. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 335 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 61.062(a)-(e). Section 61.”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 61.062(b) — 3 cases
Texas Underground, Inc. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 335 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 61.062(a)-(e). Section 61.”
Instrument Specialties Co. v. Texas Emp. Comm'n, 924 S.W.2d 420 (Tex. App. 1996). “Tex.LaboR Code Ann. § 61.062(b) (Vernon Pamph.”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 61.062(c) — 7 cases
Johns v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 114 F. Supp. 2d 590 (S.D. Tex. 2000).
Hawk Leasing Co. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 971 S.W.2d 598 (Tex. App. 1998).
Gutierrez v. Merit Med. Sys. (S.D. Tex. 2020).
— Tex. Lab. Code § 61.062(d) — 5 cases
Kshatrya v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 97 S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App. 2003). “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 61.062 (c) (Vernon 1996).”
Texas Underground, Inc. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 335 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. App. 2011). “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 61.062(a)-(e). Section 61.”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 61.062(e) — 4 cases
Holmans v. Transource Polymers, Inc., 914 S.W.2d 189 (Tex. App. 1996). “Tex.Labor Code Ann. § 61.062(e) (Vernon Pamph.”
New Boston Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 47 S.W.3d 34 (Tex. App. 2001). “Naples contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because as a matter of law the summary judgment evidence did not constitute substantial evidence to support the TWC Payday Law Decision.”
Direct Commc'ns, Inc. v. Lunsford, 906 S.W.2d 537 (Tex. App. 1995). “2d at 831 , see also current codification at TexLabor Code Ann. § 61.062(e) (Vernon 1995)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.