Texas Codes

Tex. Loc. Gov't Code § 143.010 (2026)

Commission Appeal Procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 143.010. COMMISSION APPEAL PROCEDURE. (a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, if a fire fighter or police officer wants to appeal to the commission from an action for which an appeal or review is provided by this chapter, the fire fighter or police officer need only file an appeal with the commission within 10 days after the date the action occurred.

(b) The appeal must include the basis for the appeal and a request for a commission hearing. The appeal must also contain a statement denying the truth of the charge as made, a statement taking exception to the legal sufficiency of the charge, a statement alleging that the recommended action does not fit the offense or alleged offense, or a combination of these statements.

(c) In each hearing, appeal, or review of any kind in which the commission performs an adjudicatory function, the affected fire fighter or police officer is entitled to be represented by counsel or a person the fire fighter or police officer chooses. Each commission proceeding shall be held in public.

(d) The commission may issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for the attendance of witnesses and for the production of documentary material.

(e) The affected fire fighter or police officer may request the commission to subpoena any books, records, documents, papers, accounts, or witnesses that the fire fighter or police officer considers pertinent to the case. The fire fighter or police officer must make the request before the 10th day before the date the commission hearing will be held. If the commission does not subpoena the material, the commission shall, before the third day before the date the hearing will be held, make a written report to the fire fighter or police officer stating the reason it will not subpoena the requested material. This report shall be read into the public record of the commission hearing.

(f) Witnesses may be placed under the rule at the commission hearing.

(g) The commission shall conduct the hearing fairly and impartially as prescribed by this chapter and shall render a just and fair decision. The commission may consider only the evidence submitted at the hearing.

(h) The commission shall maintain a public record of each proceeding with copies available at cost.

(i) In addition to the requirements prescribed by this section, an appeal to the commission in a municipality with a population of 1.5 million or more must meet the requirements prescribed by Section 143.1015.

Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, Sec. 25(b), eff. Aug. 28, 1989; Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1248, Sec. 48, eff. Sept. 1, 1989.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1997–2010 · leading case: City of Houston v. Clark, 252 S.W.3d 561 (Tex. App. 2008).
City of Houston v. Clark, 252 S.W.3d 561 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “See TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 143.010(b) (Vernon 1999).”
Steubing v. City of Killeen, 298 S.W.3d 673 (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 3× “" The district court denied Steubing's attorney's fee claim.”
City of Laredo v. Almazan, 115 S.W.3d 74 (Tex. App. 2003). “The appeal must also contain a statement denying the truth of the charge as made, a statement taking exception to the legal sufficiency of the charge, a statement alleging that the recommended action does not fit the offense or alleged offense, or a combination of these…”
City of Round Rock v. Rodriguez, 317 S.W.3d 871 (Tex. App. 2010). “The undisputed evidence was that Rodriguez did not request a representative at the October 2008 meeting in which he agreed to the five-shift suspension and that he waived his appeal rights and did not file an appeal with a civil service commission. The Association and Rodriguez…”
City of Houston Fire Fighters' v. Morris, 949 S.W.2d 474 (Tex. App. 1997). “TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 143.010(a) (Vernon 1988).”
Juneth Steubing v. City of Killeen, Texas (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “" The district court denied Steubing's attorney's fee claim. DISCUSSION On appeal, no party contests the district court's determination that the hearing examiner's decision was procurred by unlawful means.”
Juneth Steubing v. City of Killeen, Texas (Tex. App. 2009). “); see also Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Ann. § 143.010 (g) (Commission may only consider evidence submitted at hearing).”
— Tex. Loc. Gov't Code § 143.010(a) — 1 case
City of Houston Fire Fighters' v. Morris, 949 S.W.2d 474 (Tex. App. 1997). “TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 143.010(a) (Vernon 1988).”
— Tex. Loc. Gov't Code § 143.010(b) — 2 cases
City of Houston v. Clark, 252 S.W.3d 561 (Tex. App. 2008). “See TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 143.010(b) (Vernon 1999).”
City of Laredo v. Almazan, 115 S.W.3d 74 (Tex. App. 2003). “The appeal must also contain a statement denying the truth of the charge as made, a statement taking exception to the legal sufficiency of the charge, a statement alleging that the recommended action does not fit the offense or alleged offense, or a combination of these…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.