Sec. 2301.751. JUDICIAL REVIEW GENERALLY. (a) A party to a proceeding affected by a final order, rule, or decision or other final action of the board with respect to a matter arising under this chapter or Chapter 503, Transportation Code, may seek judicial review of the action under the substantial evidence rule in:
(1) a district court in Travis County; or
(2) the court of appeals for the Fifteenth Court of Appeals District.
(b) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, an appeal brought in a district court may be removed to the court of appeals by any party before trial in the district court on the filing of notice of removal with the district court.
(c) Judicial review by a court, to the extent not in conflict with this chapter, is in the manner provided by Chapter 2001, Government Code. Judicial review in the court of appeals:
(1) is initiated under Chapter 2001, Government Code, in the manner review is initiated for a proceeding in a district court; and
(2) is governed by the applicable rules of appellate procedure.
Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1421, Sec. 5, eff. June 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1135 (H.B. 2741), Sec. 31, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 459 (S.B. 1045), Sec. 1.12, eff. September 1, 2023.
Notes of Decisions
Ford Motor Co. v. Butnaru, 157 S.W.3d 142 (Tex. App. 2005).
“Standards of review Because the Board is a quasi-judicial body, we review determinations regarding standing before the Board by the same standard of review by which we re *147 view the issue of standing in a trial court.”
Buddy Gregg Motor Homes, Inc. v. Marathon Coach, Inc., 320 S.W.3d 912 (Tex. App. 2010).
· cites it 3× “See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 2301.751 (a), (c). On appeal, retreating somewhat from its position in its Tarrant County district court petition, Buddy Gregg questions whether its claims (all of which are predicated on the allegation that Marathon violated the vertical-integration…”
Larry Don Atkins v. Texas Dep't of Motor Vehs. (Tex. App. 2021).
· cites it 2× “See Tex. Occ. Code § 2301.751. Atkins requests that we reverse the Director’s order revoking his dealer’s license, urging that it is based on former sales agents’ actions of which he had been unaware, that he has addressed the issues, and that such actions will not recur.”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 2301.751(2)(b) — 1 case
— Tex. Occ. Code § 2301.751(a) — 13 cases
Buddy Gregg Motor Homes, Inc. v. Marathon Coach, Inc., 320 S.W.3d 912 (Tex. App. 2010).
“See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 2301.751 (a), (c). On appeal, retreating somewhat from its position in its Tarrant County district court petition, Buddy Gregg questions whether its claims (all of which are predicated on the allegation that Marathon violated the vertical-integration…”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 2301.751(a)(1) — 3 cases
— Tex. Occ. Code § 2301.751(a)(2) — 1 case
— Tex. Occ. Code § 2301.751(b) — 3 cases
— Tex. Occ. Code § 2301.751(c) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.