Texas Codes
Tex. Penal Code § 9.53 (2026)
Maintaining Security In Correctional Facility
✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 9.53. MAINTAINING SECURITY IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. An officer or employee of a correctional facility is justified in using force against a person in custody when and to the degree the officer or employee reasonably believes the force is necessary to maintain the security of the correctional facility, the safety or security of other persons in custody or employed by the correctional facility, or his own safety or security.
Added by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 512, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Scott v. Gallagher, 209 S.W.3d 262 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007).
Scott v. Gallagher, 209 S.W.3d 262 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007). “Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 9.53 (Vernon 2003). Scott contends that this lawsuit is not frivolous because his petition specifically alleged that Gallagher’s use of force was malicious or in bad faith, and, thus, was not privileged.”
Hall v. State, 158 S.W.3d 470 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). “Tex. Pen.Code § 9.53. 21 . The trial judge appropriately included a jury instruction on section 9.”
Brock v. State, 295 S.W.3d 45 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009). “Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.53 (Vernon 2003).”
Stewart v. State, 221 S.W.3d 306 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007). “*314 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.53 (Vernon 2003).”
Johnson v. Peterson, 799 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. App. 1990). “Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 9.53 (Vernon Supp.1990), and because defendants Purvis, Belanger, and Peterson, as employees of the State, are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity from damages.”
Thomas E. Ladner v. J.B. Smith, 941 F.2d 356 (5th Cir. 1991). “See Tex.Penal Code Ann. §§ 9.53, 39.021(a)(1) & (2) (Vernon 1989 & Supp.”
Ladner v. State, 790 S.W.2d 671 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1988). “The instructions referred to in the above-quoted paragraph of the charge relate to the justification defense provided by Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.53 (Vernon Supp.”
Ladner v. Smith, 740 F. Supp. 1254 (E.D. Tex. 1990). “But petitioners argue further that in the Sabine County cases, the prosecution had an additional trial burden of disproving or negating beyond a reasonable doubt the defense of “justification” under Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.53 . 2 Petitioners assert that the only issue on which…”
Dennis Walker v. State of Texas, No. 05-19-01368-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 16, 2021). “3 Appellant further argues that Williams used excessive force within the meaning of Texas Penal Code § 9.53. See PENAL § 9.53.”
Brian Charles Frankenfield v. State of Texas, No. 01-22-00625-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 31, 2023). “” TEX. PENAL CODE § 9.53; see id. § 1.07(a)(14)(A) (defining “correctional facility” to include “a municipal or county jail”).”
Ricardo Gonzales, Jr. v. State of Texas, No. 04-22-00483-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 27, 2025). “” TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 9.53. Therefore, Trevino’s testimony concerning his belief that Gonzales did not perform the leg sweep or impermissible maneuver but instead performed the necessary actions to gain control over Gilbert, goes to the very nature of whether - 10 -…”
Jordash Jerome Henderson v. State, No. 14-10-00904-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 19, 2012). “See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 9.53 (West 2011). ―Knowing the innate danger in maintaining a correctional facility, the legislature grants correctional officers the right to use reasonable force against an inmate to maintain their own safety, the safety of others, or the security of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.