Sec. 11.001. PLACE OF RECORDING. (a) To be effectively recorded, an instrument relating to real property must be eligible for recording and must be recorded in the county in which a part of the property is located. However, if such an instrument grants a security interest by a utility as defined in Section 261.001, Business & Commerce Code, the instrument may be recorded as required by Sections 261.004 and 261.006 of that code, and if such instrument is so recorded, the lien and the secured interest created by such instrument shall be deemed perfected for all purposes.
(b) If an instrument has been recorded in a proper county, the subsequent creation of a new county containing property conveyed or encumbered by the instrument does not affect the recording's validity or effect as notice. The county court of the new county shall at its own expense:
(1) obtain a certified transcript of the record of all instruments conveying or encumbering property in the new county;
(2) deposit the transcript for public inspection in the recorder's office of the new county; and
(3) make an index of the transcript.
Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3486, ch. 576, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 999, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by:
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 885 (H.B. 2278), Sec. 2.32, eff. April 1, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Martin v. Martin, 363 S.W.3d 221 (Tex. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “[12] TEX. PROP.CODE ANN. §§ 11.001, et seq. (West 2004 & Supp.”
Sanchez v. Telles, 960 S.W.2d 762 (Tex. App. 1997).
“2d at 429-430, citing Tex.PROP.Code Ann. § 11.001(a)(Vernon 1984).”
Moser v. Bank of Tyler (In re Loggins), 513 B.R. 682 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2014).
“Texas Property Code § 11.001(c) The Bank contends that no diminution of the estate occurred as a result of the sale nor was the interest of any unsecured creditor prejudiced by its receipt of the $2.”
Byman v. Denson (In re Edwards), 537 B.R. 797 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2015).
“Tex. Prop.Code § 11.001 (West 2014). Application of the foregoing suggests that the transfer date was March 18, 2013.”
Aston Meadows, Ltd., Montclaire Custom Homes, L.P., Peter Paulsen, Steve Paulsen, Mike Wells, Kathryn Leblanc, Donald Leblanc, Natalie J. Warnick, James S. Warnick, & Kathy Ivey v. Devon Energy Prod. Co., L.P. & Devon Energy Corp. (Tex. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “” Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 11.001 (a) (West Supp.”
Tuwana S. Gildon v. ARVM 5, LLC (Tex. App. 2020).
“See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 11.001 (a). IX. Conclusion We have struggled to interpret the issues that Appellant raises in her brief, the claims that she made in the trial court, and the record of the trial.”
Wyly v. Eichor (5th Cir. 2025).
“See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 11.001 (a) (“To be effectively recorded, an instrument 10 Case: 24-20238 Document: 105-1 Page: 11 Date Filed: 01/28/2025 No.”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 11.001(a) — 3 cases
Sanchez v. Telles, 960 S.W.2d 762 (Tex. App. 1997).
“2d at 429-430, citing Tex.PROP.Code Ann. § 11.001(a)(Vernon 1984).”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 11.001(b) — 1 case
— Tex. Prop. Code § 11.001(c) — 1 case
Moser v. Bank of Tyler (In re Loggins), 513 B.R. 682 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2014).
“Texas Property Code § 11.001(c) The Bank contends that no diminution of the estate occurred as a result of the sale nor was the interest of any unsecured creditor prejudiced by its receipt of the $2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.