Tex. Codes » Property Code · TITLE 11. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS · CHAPTER 201. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN SUBDIVISIONS
Texas Codes

Tex. Prop. Code § 201.010 (2026)

Action And Limitations Of Remedies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 201.010. ACTION AND LIMITATIONS OF REMEDIES. (a) If an owner and the owner's predecessors in interest neither signed the petition nor filed the statement described in the fourth listed category in Section 201.009(b), the owner may file a suit for declaratory judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction:

(1) to challenge the completeness or regularity of the procedures leading to the recordation of a certificate, if the suit is filed before the 181st day after the date on which the certificate is filed with the county clerk; or

(2) to exclude the owner's property from the operation of the extended, modified, added to, or created restriction.

(b) A suit for a declaratory judgment must name as defendants the final members of the petition committee who are owners of property in the subdivision at the time of the filing of the suit. In addition, a suit for a declaratory judgment must name all other owners of property in the subdivision as defendants, either as individuals or as members of a class.

(c) An owner who files a suit for the second listed purpose in Subsection (a) is entitled to relief only if the owner pleads and establishes that the conditions of land use within the subdivision at the time the certificate was filed were incompatible with the restriction. As an alternative to excluding a specific parcel of land from the operation of the restriction, a court may alter the restriction as it applies to the parcel to better conform to the incompatible conditions.

(d) The remedies in this section are exclusive of all others in actions brought to challenge a restriction extended, modified, added to, or created under this chapter. The filing of an action for the first listed purpose in Subsection (a) does not prevent the restriction from taking effect in accordance with its terms pending a final judgment.

Added by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 309, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2003 · leading case: Dahl v. Hartman, 14 S.W.3d 434 (Tex. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dahl v. Hartman, 14 S.W.3d 434 (Tex. App. 2000). “See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 201.010(b) (Vernon 1995) (stating that all property owners in a community must be made parties in a declaratory judgment action challenging deed restrictions).”
Simpson v. Afton Oaks Civic Club, Inc., 117 S.W.3d 480 (Tex. App. 2003). “006(a) (Vernon 1997) and by Tex PROp.Code Ann. § 201.010(b) (Vernon 1995).”
John F. Simpson v. Afton Oaks Civic Club, Inc. (Tex. App. 2003). “006 (a) (Vernon 1997) and by Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 201.010 (b) (Vernon 1995).”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 201.010(b) — 2 cases
Dahl v. Hartman, 14 S.W.3d 434 (Tex. App. 2000). “See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 201.010(b) (Vernon 1995) (stating that all property owners in a community must be made parties in a declaratory judgment action challenging deed restrictions).”
Simpson v. Afton Oaks Civic Club, Inc., 117 S.W.3d 480 (Tex. App. 2003). “006(a) (Vernon 1997) and by Tex PROp.Code Ann. § 201.010(b) (Vernon 1995).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.