Texas Codes

Tex. Prop. Code § 5.021 (2026)

Instrument Of Conveyance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 5.021. INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE. A conveyance of an estate of inheritance, a freehold, or an estate for more than one year, in land and tenements, must be in writing and must be subscribed and delivered by the conveyor or by the conveyor's agent authorized in writing.

Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3481, ch. 576, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 142 cases (30 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: West Beach Marina, Ltd. v. Erdeljac, 94 S.W.3d 248 (Tex. App. 2002).
West Beach Marina, Ltd. v. Erdeljac, 94 S.W.3d 248 (Tex. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “The Statute of Frauds requires that a contract for the sale of real estate be in writing and signed by the person to be charged. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 26.01 (West 1987).”
Gordon v. West Houston Trees, Ltd., 352 S.W.3d 32 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “To convey an interest in land under the statute of conveyances, the instrument of conveyance must be in writing, must be signed, and must be delivered by the party disposing of his interest.”
Troxel v. Bishop, 201 S.W.3d 290 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “2006); Tex. PROP.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2004).”
Seber v. Union Pac. R.R., 350 S.W.3d 640 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2003).”
Jackson v. Wildflower Prod. Co., 505 S.W.3d 80 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Tex. PROP. Code ANN. § 5.021 (West 2014).”
Heblen Kanan, Pharr Plantation Inc. & Pharr Plantation Mgmt. Co., Ltd. v. Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc., 407 S.W.3d 320 (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (West 2004). By their fourth sub-issue, appellants similarly contend that the Rule 11 Agreement is not enforceable because it was made orally but is not to be performed within one year, or alternatively, because it constitutes a contract for sale…”
Adams v. First Nat'l Bank of Bells/Savoy, 154 S.W.3d 859 (Tex. App. 2005). “The Bank contends there is no issue of fact that it foreclosed because of the due-on-sale clause, and that the timing of the transfer does not raise an issue of fact.”
Murphy v. Long, 170 S.W.3d 621 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Tex.PROp.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984).”
Williams v. Jennings, 755 S.W.2d 874 (Tex. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Appellants leased the Brightwells' one-fourth interest and claim that appellee cannot prove she possessed title to that interest because the reformed deed reserved it to the Brightwells.”
Cullins v. Foster, 171 S.W.3d 521 (Tex. App. 2005). “” Tex. PROp.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984) (emphasis added).”
TLC Hosp., LLC v. Pillar Income Asset Mgmt., Inc., 570 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. App. 2018). “See TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 5.021 (West 2014); TEX.”
McCuen v. Huey, 255 S.W.3d 716 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “Tex. PROp.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2003).”
Vinson v. Brown, 80 S.W.3d 221 (Tex. App. 2002). “See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 5.021 (West 1984).”
in Re Est. of William H. McNutt, 405 S.W.3d 194 (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 5.021 (West 2004) (“Instrument of Conveyance”); see also TEX.”
2616 South Loop L.L.C. v. Health Source Home Care, Inc., 201 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. App. 2006). “estate for more than one year, in land and tenements, must be in writing and must be subscribed and delivered by the conveyor or by the conveyor’s agent authorized in wilting.”
Apex Fin. Corp. v. Garza, 155 S.W.3d 230 (Tex. App. 2004). “Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984); Tex.”
Hernandez v. Hernandez, 547 S.W.3d 898 (Tex. App. 2018). “TEX.PROP.CODE ANN. § 5.021 (West 2014) ("A conveyance of an estate of inheritance, a freehold, or an estate for more than one year, in land and tenements, must be in writing and must be subscribed and delivered by the conveyor or by the conveyor's agent authorized in writing.”
Nicol v. Gonzales, 127 S.W.3d 390 (Tex. App. 2004). “Tex Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2004).”
Reiland v. Patrick Thomas Props., Inc., 213 S.W.3d 431 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. PROp.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984); Tex.”
in the Est. of Robert L. Wright, 482 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Tex. Prop. Code § 5.021 (“Instrument of Conveyance”); see also Tex.”
Enochs v. Brown, 872 S.W.2d 312 (Tex. App. 1994). “See Tex.Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (West 1984) (insti’ument of conveyance must be in writing and must be subscribed and delivered); Tex.”
Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., 938 S.W.2d 102 (Tex. App. 1997). “TexProp.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984). This provision has been held applicable to assignments of leases for terms longer than a year.”
Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co., 957 S.W.2d 82 (Tex. App. 1997). “See Tex. PROp.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984).”
Kerrville HRH, Inc. v. City of Kerrville, 803 S.W.2d 377 (Tex. App. 1990). “HRH contends that the alleged modification is invalid as a matter of law because it was required to be in writing. A lease of real estate for a term of more than *389 one year must be in writing and must be signed by the person to be charged.”
MASGAS v. Anderson, 310 S.W.3d 567 (Tex. App. 2010). “Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2004).”
Noell v. Crow-Billingsley Air Park Ltd. P'ship, 233 S.W.3d 408 (Tex. App. 2007). “A common element of each of these defenses was lack of delivery of the original deed for the lots to appellant.”
Martin v. Cockrell, 335 S.W.3d 229 (Tex. App. 2010). “See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2004).”
Cecil v. Smith, 790 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “, placing the deed under the control of the grantee with the intention to convey present title to the grantee, "meaningless.”
Anderson Energy Corp. v. Dominion Oklahoma Texas Expl. & Prod., Inc., 469 S.W.3d 280 (Tex. App. 2015). “The Statute of Frauds requires that contracts for the sale of real property be in writing and signed by the person to be charged.”
Chambers v. Equity Bank, SSB, 319 S.W.3d 892 (Tex. App. 2010). “Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2004); Noell v.”
Thompson v. Clayton, 346 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. App. 2009). “Tex.Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 2004); Murphy v.”
Burgess v. Easley, 893 S.W.2d 87 (Tex. App. 1994). “An instrument conveying real property “must be subscribed and delivered by the conveyor_” Tex.Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984) (emphasis added).”
Byman v. Denson (In re Edwards), 537 B.R. 797 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2015). “Tex. Prop.Code § 5.021 (West 2014). Such a conveyance is void as to a creditor or a subsequent purchaser for valuable consideration without notice unless the instrument is acknowledged and filed of record as required by law.”
Green v. Canon, 33 S.W.3d 855 (Tex. App. 2000). “Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984).”
In re Anloc, LLC, 487 B.R. 825 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2013). · cites it 2× “Tex. Prop.Code § 5.021 (“A conveyance....”
Taylor v. Hill, 249 S.W.3d 618 (Tex. App. 2008). “We dismiss as moot Taylor’s motion to strike the ami-cus briefs of Consolidated and Bexley and Consolidated’s motion for an emergency stay.”
United Sav. Ass'n of Texas v. Villanueva, 878 S.W.2d 619 (Tex. App. 1994). “Tex.Prop.Code Ann. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984).”
Laird Hill Salt Water Disposal, Ltd. v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal, Inc., 351 S.W.3d 81 (Tex. App. 2011). “01 (Vernon 2009); TEX. PROP.CODE ANN. § 5.021 (Vernon 2004).”
Reeder John v. Billie Brewer Curry, 426 S.W.3d 352 (Tex. App. 2014). “” Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 5.021 (West 2004).”
Owen v. Porter, 796 S.W.2d 265 (Tex. App. 1990). “TEX.PROP.CODE ANN. § 5.021 (Vernon 1984).”
Gomez v. Kamper Investments, LLC (In Re Gomez), 388 B.R. 279 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2008). · cites it 2×
B & A Pipeline Co. v. Dorney, 904 F.2d 996 (5th Cir. 1990).
Bell v. Comm'r, 2011 T.C. Summary Opinion 54 (Tax Ct. 2011).
Dennis Steven Pertolanitz v. Damon Salone Waldroup (Tex. App. 2025). · cites it 3×
in Re the Est. of William H. McNutt (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 4×
in the Est. of Roosevelt Green Sr. (Tex. App. 2021). · cites it 2×
Conocophillips Co. v. Kenneth Hahn (Tex. 2024). · cites it 2×
Noe Barragan v. Celene Barragan (Tex. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Pensive Props. LP v. Terry Barnhart & All Occupants (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 3×
May v. Buck, 375 S.W.3d 568 (2012).
Est. of Sympson v. Comm'r, 67 T.C.M. 1914 (Tax Ct. 1994).
Jason Hendershot A/K/A Jason Hendershott v. State (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2×
Glenn A. Wade & Karen Wade v. XTO Energy Inc. (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2×
John W. Hankins v. Sarah T. Harris (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2×
Unknown, 34 F.3d 285.
the Est. of Leroy T. Keener (Tex. App. 2019).
Hill v. Herring (In re Herring), 550 B.R. 119 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2016).
Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Jones), 573 B.R. 665 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2017).
Ma-bbo Five, Lp (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2022).
Ma Bb Owen Lp (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2022).
Eichor v. Wyly (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2022).
Earnest Taylor v. Vernice Hill (Tex. App. 2004).
Earnest Taylor v. Vernice Hill (Tex. App. 2004).
Stevie Preston Dean v. State (Tex. App. 2003).
in the Est. of Bertha Costello (Tex. App. 2008).
Bell v. Comm'r, 2013 T.C. Summary Opinion 20 (Tax Ct. 2013).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.