Texas Codes

Tex. Transp. Code § 501.071 (2026)

Sale Of Vehicle; Transfer Of Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 501.071. SALE OF VEHICLE; TRANSFER OF TITLE. (a) Except as provided by Sections 503.036 and 503.039, a motor vehicle may not be the subject of a subsequent sale unless the owner designated on the title submits a transfer of ownership of the title.

(b) The transfer of the title must be in a manner prescribed by the department that:

(1) certifies the purchaser is the owner of the vehicle; and

(2) certifies there are no liens on the vehicle or provides a release of each lien on the vehicle.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1127 (H.B. 2495), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.

Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1296 (H.B. 2357), Sec. 32, eff. January 1, 2012.

Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 969 (S.B. 2076), Sec. 14, eff. September 1, 2017.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: First Nat. Bank of El Campo, Texas v. Buss, 143 S.W.3d 915 (Tex. App. 2004).
First Nat. Bank of El Campo, Texas v. Buss, 143 S.W.3d 915 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 501.071 (Vernon 1999).”
Lundy v. First Nat'l Bank (In Re Dota), 288 B.R. 448 (S.D. Tex. 2003). · cites it 5× “Tex. Trans. Code § 501.071. Lundy argues that because Dota was a “dealer” and not an “owner” as those terms are defined by § 501.”
Comerica Acceptance Corp. v. Dallas Cent. Appraisal Dist., 52 S.W.3d 495 (Tex. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “2001); Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 501.071 (Vernon 1999).”
Vibbert v. Par, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 317 (Tex. App. 2006). “But the Act additionally provides that Chapters 1 through 9 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code control over a conflicting provision of Chapter 501.”
Arcadia Fin., Ltd. v. Sw.-Tex Leasing Co., 78 S.W.3d 619 (Tex. App. 2002). “” Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 501.071 (a) (West 1999); see also id.”
Albert Lujan D/B/A Texas Wholesale Flower Co. v. Navistar, Inc., Navistar Int'l Corp., Navistar Int'l Transp. Corp., Int'l Truck & Engine Corp. & Santex Truck Centers, Ltd., 503 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. App. 2016). “See Tex. Transp. Code §§ 501.071(a) (“[A] motor vehicle may not be the subject of a subsequent sale unless the owner designated on the title submits a transfer of 23 ownership of the title.”
Tyler Car & Truck Ctr. v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2 S.W.3d 482 (Tex. App. 1999). “Tex. TRAnsp. Code Ann. § 501.071 (Vernon 1997).”
Gourrier v. Joe Myers Motors, Inc., 115 S.W.3d 570 (Tex. App. 2002). “6687-1, §§ 33 & 53, repealed and codified at Tex. Trans. Code §§ 501.071 & 501.073). Non-compliance does not affect a sale “as between the parties, when the purposes of the Certificate of Title Act are not defeated.”
Bank One Texas N.A. v. Arcadia Fin. Ltd., 219 F.3d 494 (5th Cir. 2000). “2 Bank One argues that, as between Arcadia and Bank One, the consumers were not buyers in the ordinary course of business because a valid sale never took place under the Texas Certificate of Title Act.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Scott, 866 F. Supp. 2d 680 (S.D. Tex. 2012). “Tex. Transp. Code § 501.071. The Title Act dictates the correct form of title and voids sales with defective certificates of title.”
Gourrier v. Joe Myers Motors, Inc., 78 S.W.3d 651 (Tex. App. 2002). “6687-1, §§ 33 & 53, repealed and codified at Tex. Trans. Code §§ 501.071 & 501.073). Non-compliance does not affect a sale “as between the parties, when the purposes of the Certificate of Title Act are not defeated.”
Dockside Marine, L.L.C. v. Joshua Walker, Bryan Brown, & HTX Watersports, L.L.C. (Tex. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “” See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 501.071 . Even so, the Water Safety Act covers watercraft MSOs, and “[t]here is no indication that the legislature intended the automobile Certificate of Title Act to apply to boat and outboard motor transactions.”
— Tex. Transp. Code § 501.071(a) — 5 cases
Lundy v. First Nat'l Bank (In Re Dota), 288 B.R. 448 (S.D. Tex. 2003). “Tex. Trans. Code § 501.071. Lundy argues that because Dota was a “dealer” and not an “owner” as those terms are defined by § 501.”
Vibbert v. Par, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 317 (Tex. App. 2006). “But the Act additionally provides that Chapters 1 through 9 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code control over a conflicting provision of Chapter 501.”
Albert Lujan D/B/A Texas Wholesale Flower Co. v. Navistar, Inc., Navistar Int'l Corp., Navistar Int'l Transp. Corp., Int'l Truck & Engine Corp. & Santex Truck Centers, Ltd., 503 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. App. 2016). “See Tex. Transp. Code §§ 501.071(a) (“[A] motor vehicle may not be the subject of a subsequent sale unless the owner designated on the title submits a transfer of 23 ownership of the title.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.