Texas Codes

Tex. Tax Code § 34.04 (2026)

Claims For Excess Proceeds

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 34.04. CLAIMS FOR EXCESS PROCEEDS. (a) A person, including a taxing unit and the Title IV-D agency, may file a petition in the court that ordered the seizure or sale setting forth a claim to the excess proceeds. The petition must be filed before the second anniversary of the date of the sale of the property. The petition is not required to be filed as an original suit separate from the underlying suit for seizure of the property or foreclosure of a tax lien on the property but may be filed under the cause number of the underlying suit.

(b) A copy of the petition shall be served, in the manner prescribed by Rule 21a, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, or that rule's successor, on all parties to the underlying action not later than the 20th day before the date set for a hearing on the petition.

(c) At the hearing the court shall order that the proceeds be paid according to the following priorities to each party that establishes its claim to the proceeds:

(1) to the tax sale purchaser if the tax sale has been adjudged to be void and the purchaser has prevailed in an action against the taxing units under Section 34.07(d) by final judgment;

(2) to a taxing unit for any taxes, penalties, or interest that have become due or delinquent on the subject property subsequent to the date of the judgment or that were omitted from the judgment by accident or mistake;

(3) to any other lienholder, consensual or otherwise, for the amount due under a lien, in accordance with the priorities established by applicable law;

(4) to a taxing unit for any unpaid taxes, penalties, interest, or other amounts adjudged due under the judgment that were not satisfied from the proceeds from the tax sale; and

(5) to each former owner of the property, as the interest of each may appear, provided that the former owner:

(A) was a defendant in the judgment;

(B) is related within the third degree by consanguinity or affinity to a former owner that was a defendant in the judgment; or

(C) acquired by will or intestate succession the interest in the property of a former owner that was a defendant in the judgment.

(c-1) Except as provided by Subsections (c)(5)(B) and (C), a former owner of the property that acquired an interest in the property after the date of the judgment may not establish a claim to the proceeds. For purposes of this subsection, a former owner of the property is considered to have acquired an interest in the property after the date of the judgment if the deed by which the former owner acquired the interest was recorded in the real property records of the county in which the property is located after the date of the judgment.

(d) Interest or costs may not be allowed under this section.

(e) An order under this section directing that all or part of the excess proceeds be paid to a party is appealable.

(f) A person may not take an assignment or other transfer of an owner's claim to excess proceeds unless:

(1) the assignment or transfer is taken on or after the 36th day after the date the excess proceeds are deposited in the registry of the court;

(2) the assignment or transfer is in writing and signed by the assignor or transferor;

(3) the assignment or transfer is not the result of an in-person or telephone solicitation;

(4) the assignee or transferee pays the assignor or transferor on the date of the assignment or transfer an amount equal to at least 80 percent of the amount of the assignor's or transferor's claim to the excess proceeds; and

(5) the assignment or transfer document contains a sworn statement by the assignor or transferor affirming:

(A) that the assignment or transfer was given voluntarily;

(B) the date on which the assignment or transfer was made and that the date was not earlier than the 36th day after the date the excess proceeds were deposited in the registry of the court;

(C) that the assignor or transferor has received the notice from the clerk required by Section 34.03;

(D) the nature and specific amount of consideration given for the assignment or transfer;

(E) the circumstances under which the excess proceeds are in the registry of the court;

(F) the amount of the claim to excess proceeds in the registry of the court;

(G) that the assignor or transferor has made no other assignments or transfers of the assignor's or transferor's claim to the excess proceeds;

(H) that the assignor or transferor knows that the assignor or transferor may retain counsel; and

(I) that the consideration was paid in full on the date of the assignment or transfer and that the consideration paid was an amount equal to at least 80 percent of the amount of the assignor's or transferor's claim to the excess proceeds.

(g) An assignee or transferee who obtains excess proceeds without complying with Subsection (f) is liable to the assignor or transferor for the amount of excess proceeds obtained plus attorney's fees and expenses. An assignee or transferee who attempts to obtain excess proceeds without complying with Subsection (f) is liable to the assignor or transferor for attorney's fees and expenses.

(h) An assignee or transferee who files a petition setting forth a claim to excess proceeds must attach a copy of the assignment or transfer document and produce the original of the assignment or transfer document in court at the hearing on the petition. If the original assignment or transfer document is lost, the assignee or transferee must obtain the presence of the assignor or transferor to testify at the hearing. In addition, the assignee or transferee must produce at the hearing the original of any evidence verifying the payment of the consideration given for the assignment or transfer. If the original of any evidence of the payment is lost or if the payment was in cash, the assignee or transferee must obtain the presence of the assignor or transferor to testify at the hearing.

(i) A fee charged by an attorney to obtain excess proceeds for an owner may not be greater than 25 percent of the amount obtained or $1,000, whichever is less. A person who is not an attorney may not charge a fee to obtain excess proceeds for an owner.

(j) The amount of the excess proceeds the court may order be paid to an assignee or transferee may not exceed 125 percent of the amount the assignee or transferee paid the assignor or transferor on the date of the assignment or transfer.

Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 2298, ch. 841, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1982. Amended by Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 4829, ch. 851, Sec. 26, eff. Aug. 29, 1983; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1185, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1481, Sec. 26, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 18.007, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1430, Sec. 27, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 319, Sec. 10, eff. June 18, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 254 (H.B. 406), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2009.

Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 508 (H.B. 1674), Sec. 22, eff. September 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Loera v. Interstate Inv. Corp., 93 S.W.3d 224 (Tex. App. 2002).
Loera v. Interstate Inv. Corp., 93 S.W.3d 224 (Tex. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “Invalidity of Loera’s Assignment to Interstate Appellants argue that Loera’s assignment to Interstate is invalid because (A) an amendment to Texas Tax Code section 34.04 renders Loera’s pre-amendment assignment to Interstate void and (B) Interstate violated the DTPA and breached…”
Royal Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Ragsdale, 273 S.W.3d 759 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “” Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(a). Ragsdale filed his motion claiming right to the excess proceeds one day before the two-year deadline.”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., as Indenture Tr. for New Century Home Loan Trust 2006-2 v. Stockdick Land Co., 367 S.W.3d 308 (Tex. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 34.04 (a) (West 2012).”
Crowell v. Bexar Cnty., 351 S.W.3d 114 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “One month later, the Crowells Sled a “Petition for Release of Excess Proceeds” pursuant to Texas Tax Code section 34.04, asking the trial court to direct payment of the excess proceeds to them.”
Strauss v. Belt, 322 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 34.04 (West Supp. 2009).”
Davis v. Kaufman Cnty., 195 S.W.3d 847 (Tex. App. 2006). “” Tex. Tax Code AnN. § 34.04(i) (Vernon Supp.”
Mem'l Park Med. Ctr., Inc. v. River Bend Dev. Grp., L.P., 264 S.W.3d 810 (Tex. App. 2008). “The purchaser could seek the funds (in excess of taxes paid) under former Tex. Tax Code § 34.04 (1983) or the purchaser could file a separate suit against the taxing authority under former Tex.”
Franks v. Woodville Indep. Sch. Dist., 132 S.W.3d 167 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 34.04 (a) (Vernon Supp.”
Nipper-Berthram Trust v. Aldine Indep. Sch. Dist., 76 S.W.3d 788 (Tex. App. 2002). “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 34.04 (c)(1). We agree with the taxing authorities.”
Dallas Cnty. Grand Prairie v. Sides, 430 S.W.3d 649 (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 34.04 (a). Appellees brought their claim timely.”
Woodside Assurance, Inc v. N. K. Resources, Inc., 175 S.W.3d 421 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “NKR bought the property from Gibbs prior to the tax foreclosure sale. Second, Bhagia did not qualify to recover any of the excess proceeds pursuant to the priority rules in the Property Tax Code.”
Linda Coleman v. Victoria Cnty., 385 S.W.3d 608 (Tex. App. 2012). “We agree with the proposition that the legislature chose to impose a time limit for a party — including the former owner of the foreclosed property — to pursue a claim for excess proceeds, see id.”
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(a) — 11 cases
Royal Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Ragsdale, 273 S.W.3d 759 (Tex. App. 2008). “” Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(a). Ragsdale filed his motion claiming right to the excess proceeds one day before the two-year deadline.”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., as Indenture Tr. for New Century Home Loan Trust 2006-2 v. Stockdick Land Co., 367 S.W.3d 308 (Tex. App. 2012). “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 34.04 (a) (West 2012).”
Franks v. Woodville Indep. Sch. Dist., 132 S.W.3d 167 (Tex. App. 2004). “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 34.04 (a) (Vernon Supp.”
Linda Coleman v. Victoria Cnty., 385 S.W.3d 608 (Tex. App. 2012). “We agree with the proposition that the legislature chose to impose a time limit for a party — including the former owner of the foreclosed property — to pursue a claim for excess proceeds, see id.”
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(b) — 1 case
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(c)(1) — 1 case
Woodside Assur. v. NK RESOURCES, 175 S.W.3d 421 (Tex. App. 2005).
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(e) — 4 cases
Royal Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Ragsdale, 273 S.W.3d 759 (Tex. App. 2008). “” Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(a). Ragsdale filed his motion claiming right to the excess proceeds one day before the two-year deadline.”
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(f) — 1 case
Woodside Assur. v. NK RESOURCES, 175 S.W.3d 421 (Tex. App. 2005).
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(f)(4) — 1 case
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(h) — 1 case
Crowell v. Bexar Cnty., 351 S.W.3d 114 (Tex. App. 2011). “One month later, the Crowells Sled a “Petition for Release of Excess Proceeds” pursuant to Texas Tax Code section 34.04, asking the trial court to direct payment of the excess proceeds to them.”
— Tex. Tax Code § 34.04(i) — 1 case
Davis v. Kaufman Cnty., 195 S.W.3d 847 (Tex. App. 2006). “” Tex. Tax Code AnN. § 34.04(i) (Vernon Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.