Tex. Codes » Tax Code · TITLE 1. PROPERTY TAX CODE · SUBTITLE F. REMEDIES · CHAPTER 42. JUDICIAL REVIEW
Texas Codes

Tex. Tax Code § 42.28 (2026)

Appeal Of District Court Judgment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 42.28. APPEAL OF DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT. A party may appeal the final judgment of the district court as provided by law for appeal of civil suits generally, except that an appeal bond is not required of the chief appraiser, the county, the comptroller, or the commissioners court.

Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 2312, ch. 841, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1982. Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., 2nd C.S., ch. 6, Sec. 57, eff. Sept. 1, 1991.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1983–2015 · leading case: Dallas Cnty. Bail Bond Bd. v. Mason, 773 S.W.2d 586 (Tex. App. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dallas Cnty. Bail Bond Bd. v. Mason, 773 S.W.2d 586 (Tex. App. 1989). “” TEX.TAX CODE ANN. § 42.28 (Vernon 1982) (emphasis added).”
G.E. Am. Commc'n v. Galveston Cent. Appraisal Dist., 979 S.W.2d 761 (Tex. App. 1998). “See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 42.28 (Vernon 1992).”
Harris Cnty. Appraisal Dist. v. World Houston, Inc., 905 S.W.2d 594 (Tex. App. 1995). “TexTax Code Ann. § 42.28 (Vernon 1992). If a property owner fails to timely file a protest as outlined in Chapter 41, the law provides a second, but very limited, avenue by which he can seek relief.”
Brady Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Davenport, 663 S.W.2d 637 (Tex. App. 1983). “In support of the motion, appellee cites Tex.Tax Code § 42.28 (1982) which provides: A party may appeal the final judgment of the district court as provided by law for appeal of civil suits generally, except that an appeal bond is not required of the chief appraiser, the county,…”
El Paso Cent. Appraisal Dist. v. Placitas De Zaragosa Grp., LLC N/K/A Placitas De Zaragosa Grp. Ass'n (Tex. App. 2015). “See TEX.TAX CODE ANN. § 42.28 (West 2015). The El Paso Central Appraisal District is attempting to appeal an order which partially grants the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.