Texas Codes

Tex. Util. Code § 36.061 (2026)

Allowance Of Certain Expenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 36.061. ALLOWANCE OF CERTAIN EXPENSES. (a) The regulatory authority may not allow as a cost or expense for ratemaking purposes:

(1) an expenditure for legislative advocacy; or

(2) an expenditure described by Section 32.104 that the regulatory authority determines to be not in the public interest.

(b) The regulatory authority may allow as a cost or expense:

(1) reasonable charitable or civic contributions not to exceed the amount approved by the regulatory authority; and

(2) reasonable costs of participating in a proceeding under this title not to exceed the amount approved by the regulatory authority.

(c) An electric utility located in a portion of this state not subject to retail competition may establish a bill payment assistance program for a customer who is a military veteran who a medical doctor certifies has a significantly decreased ability to regulate the individual's body temperature because of severe burns received in combat. A regulatory authority shall allow as a cost or expense a cost or expense of the bill payment assistance program. The electric utility is entitled to:

(1) fully recover all costs and expenses related to the bill payment assistance program;

(2) defer each cost or expense related to the bill payment assistance program not explicitly included in base rates; and

(3) apply carrying charges at the utility's weighted average cost of capital to the extent related to the bill payment assistance program.

Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 166, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Amended by:

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 597 (S.B. 981), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2013.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 406 S.W.3d 253 (Tex. App. 2013).
Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 406 S.W.3d 253 (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “See Tex. UtiLCode § 36.061(b)(2). The expenses accounted for in the utility’s cost of service are “limited to amounts actually realized or which can be anticipated with reasonable certainty.”
Texas Indus. Energy Consumers v. Centerpoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 324 S.W.3d 95 (Tex. 2010). “Courts must affirm administrative findings in contested cases if there is more than a scintilla of evidence to support them.”) (citations omitted).”
Centerpoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities, 263 S.W.3d 448 (Tex. App. 2008). “” Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 36.061(b)(2) (West 2007).”
Pioneer Nat. Resources USA, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 303 S.W.3d 363 (Tex. App. 2009). “” See Tex. UtiLCode Ann. § 36.061(b)(2). Cap Rock’s Point on Appeal We turn to Cap Rock’s appeal.”
Entergy Texas, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, Off. of Pub. Util. Couns., & State of Texas Agencies & Institutions of Higher Educ. (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 6× “4, 27, 29 TEX. UTIL. CODE § 36.061 ................”
Entergy Texas, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, Off. of Pub. Util. Couns., & Texas Indus. Energy Consumers (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “25 Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 36.061 ...........”
Entergy Texas, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, Off. of Pub. Util. Couns., & State of Texas Agencies & Institutions of Higher Educ. (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “” Tex. Util. Code § 36.061(b)(2). 9 Docket 39896, (April 4, 2012) (SOAH Order No.”
Pioneer Nat. Resources USA, Inc.// Cap Rock Energy Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas & Cap Rock Energy Corp.// Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas & Pioneer Nat. Resources USA, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). “" See Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 36.061 (b)(2). Cap Rock's Point on Appeal We turn to Cap Rock's appeal.”
— Tex. Util. Code § 36.061(b) — 1 case
— Tex. Util. Code § 36.061(b)(2) — 6 cases
Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 406 S.W.3d 253 (Tex. App. 2013). “See Tex. UtiLCode § 36.061(b)(2). The expenses accounted for in the utility’s cost of service are “limited to amounts actually realized or which can be anticipated with reasonable certainty.”
Texas Indus. Energy Consumers v. Centerpoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 324 S.W.3d 95 (Tex. 2010). “Courts must affirm administrative findings in contested cases if there is more than a scintilla of evidence to support them.”) (citations omitted).”
Centerpoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities, 263 S.W.3d 448 (Tex. App. 2008). “” Tex. Util.Code Ann. § 36.061(b)(2) (West 2007).”
Pioneer Nat. Resources USA, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 303 S.W.3d 363 (Tex. App. 2009). “” See Tex. UtiLCode Ann. § 36.061(b)(2). Cap Rock’s Point on Appeal We turn to Cap Rock’s appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.