Texas Codes

Tex. Util. Code § 56.021 (2026)

Universal Service Fund Established

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 56.021. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND ESTABLISHED. The commission shall adopt and enforce rules requiring local exchange companies to establish a universal service fund to:

(1) assist telecommunications providers in providing basic local telecommunications service at reasonable rates in high cost rural areas under two plans:

(A) the Texas High Cost Universal Service Plan (16 T.A.C. Section 26.403); and

(B) the Small and Rural Incumbent Local Exchange Company Universal Service Plan (16 T.A.C. Section 26.404);

(2) reimburse the telecommunications carrier that provides the statewide telecommunications relay access service under Subchapter D;

(3) finance the specialized telecommunications assistance program established under Subchapter E;

(4) reimburse the department and the commission for costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 57;

(5) reimburse a telecommunications carrier providing lifeline service as provided by 47 C.F.R. Part 54, Subpart E, as amended;

(6) finance the implementation and administration of the identification process under Section 17.007 for telecommunications services;

(7) reimburse a designated provider under Subchapter F;

(8) reimburse a successor utility under Subchapter G; and

(9) finance the program established under Subchapter H.

Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 166, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 18.08(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 835, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1212, Sec. 23, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1553, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 651, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1451, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1276, Sec. 17.001, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., 2nd C.S., Ch. 2 (S.B. 5), Sec. 12, eff. September 7, 2005.

Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 314 (H.B. 2295), Sec. 1, eff. June 17, 2011.

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 532 (S.B. 512), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.

Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 48 (S.B. 1976), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2017.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case: In Re Sw. Bell Tel. Co. Lp, 235 S.W.3d 619 (Tex. 2007).
In Re Sw. Bell Tel. Co. Lp, 235 S.W.3d 619 (Tex. 2007). “” Tex. Util.Code §§ 56.021, 56.022(a). The PUC promulgated a rule allowing providers to recover their portion of the TUSF from retail customers via a “Texas Universal Service” surcharge, assessed as a percentage of the customer’s bill, excluding Lifeline and Link Up services.”
Texas Tel. Ass'n & Texas Statewide Tel. Coop., Inc., & Their Participating Members Windstream Servs., LLC Texas Windstream, LLC (d/B/A Windstream Commc'ns) Windstream Commc'ns Kerrville, LLC (d/B/A Windstream Commc'ns) Valor Telecomm. of Texas, LLC (d/B/A Windstream Commc'ns Sw.) Windstream Sugar Land LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas Peter Lake, Chairman Will McAdams, Comm'r Lori Cobos, Comm'r & Jimmy Glotfelty, Comm'r, Each in His or Her Off. Capacity at the Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas (Tex. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “3 Tex. Util. Code §§ 56.021, .022(a). By rule, each provider’s portion of the statewide uniform charge (referred to as the provider’s “assessment”) is calculated by multiplying the assessment rate (a percentage approved by the Commission) by the provider’s “monthly taxable…”
GS Texas Ventures, LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas (Tex. App. 2020). “Tex. Util. Code §§ 56.021, .023. The Commission in turn promulgated rules governing how an entity can obtain ETP designation so as to “receive funds from the Texas Universal Service Fund,” 16 Tex.”
— Tex. Util. Code § 56.021(1) — 1 case
— Tex. Util. Code § 56.021(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.