Texas Codes
Tex. Water Code § 13.381 (2026)
Right To Judicial Review; Evidence
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 13.381. RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW; EVIDENCE. Any party to a proceeding before the utility commission or the commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.
Added by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 795, Sec. 3.005, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.
Amended by:
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 170 (H.B. 1600), Sec. 2.66, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 171 (S.B. 567), Sec. 66, eff. September 1, 2013.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2023 · leading case: Texas Gen. Land Off. v. Crystal Clear Water Supply Corp., 449 S.W.3d 130 (Tex. App. 2014).
Texas Gen. Land Off. v. Crystal Clear Water Supply Corp., 449 S.W.3d 130 (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Water Code § 13.381 ("Any party to a proceeding before the commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.”
Texas Water Com'n v. Lakeshore Util., Co., Inc., 877 S.W.2d 814 (Tex. App. 1994). “The Commission argues that the evidence in the record is wholly inadequate to justify the increase in rates and tap fees, as well as the surcharge, requested by Lakeshore.”
Indus. Utils. Serv., Inc. v. Texas Nat. Resource Conservation Comm'n, 947 S.W.2d 712 (Tex. App. 1997). “See Tex. Water Code Ann. § 13.381 (West 1988).”
HMW Special Util. Dist. of Harris & Montgomery Counties v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas (Tex. App. 2023). “See Tex. Water Code § 13.381 (entitling party to proceeding before Commission to judicial review under substantial evidence rule).”
Texas Gen. Land Off. & Texas Comm'n on Env't Quality // Crystal Clear Water Supply Corp. v. Crystal Clear Water Supply Corp. // Texas Gen. Land Off. & Texas Comm'n on Env't Quality (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Water Code § 13.381 (“Any party to a proceeding before the commission is entitled to judicial review under the substantial evidence rule.”
Texas Water Comm'n v. Lakeshore Util. Co., Inc. (Tex. App. 1994). “The Commission argues that the evidence in the record is wholly inadequate to justify the increase in rates and tap fees, as well as the surcharge, requested by Lakeshore.”
Indus. Utils. Serv., Inc./Texas Nat. Resource Conservation Comm'n v. Texas Nat. Resource Conservation Comm'n/Indus. Utils. Serv., Inc. (Tex. App. 1997). “See Tex. Water Code Ann. § 13.381 (West 1988).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.