Texas Codes

Tex. Water Code § 36.253 (2026)

Trial Of Suit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 36.253. TRIAL OF SUIT. The burden of proof is on the petitioner, and the challenged law, rule, order, or act shall be deemed prima facie valid. The review on appeal is governed by the substantial evidence rule as defined by Section 2001.174, Government Code.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 933, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2006–2016 · leading case: In Re Edwards Aquifer Auth., 217 S.W.3d 581 (Tex. App. 2006).
In Re Edwards Aquifer Auth., 217 S.W.3d 581 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “See Tex. WateR Code Ann. § 36.253 (Vernon 2000); Tex.”
Tex-Fin, Inc. & Texas Workforce Comm'n v. Gustavo E. Ducharne, 492 S.W.3d 430 (Tex. App. 2016). “, Tex. Water Code Ann. § 36.253 .(West 2008) (expressly incorporating section 2001.”
Guitar Holding Co. v. Hudspeth Cnty. Underground Water Conservation Dist. No. 1, 209 S.W.3d 146 (Tex. App. 2006). “34 in administrative fees is contrary to substantial evidence in the administrative record that supports the District’s assessment of its administrative fees against Guitar L.”
Save Our Springs All., Inc. v. City of Kyle, 382 S.W.3d 540 (Tex. App. 2012). “See Tex. Water Code Ann. § 36.253 . Section 2001.”
Citizens Against the Landfill in Hempstead Michael McCall Wayne Knox & the City of Hempstead v. Texas Comm'n on Env't Quality & Pintail Landfill, L.L.C. (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 5× “By refusing to strike the Edwards Aquifer Authority's jury demand and setting landowners' appeal of the Authority's permitting decision for a jury trial, a trial court failed to apply the law correctly and fundamentally altered the nature of the judicial review prescribed by…”
Kinney Cnty. Groundwater Cons. Dist. v. Boulware, 238 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. App. 2007). “See TEX. WATER CODE ANN. § 36.253 (providing "[t]he burden of proof is on the petitioner, and the challenged law, rule, order, or act shall be deemed prima facie valid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.