10 U.S.C. § 10102
Purpose of reserve components
The purpose of each reserve component is to provide trained units and qualified persons available for active duty in the armed forces, in time of war or national emergency, and at such other times as the national security may require, to fill the needs of the armed forces whenever more units and persons are needed than are in the regular components.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: Dwight Stirling v. Larry Minasian, 955 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2020).
Dwight Stirling v. Larry Minasian, 955 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2020). “See 10 U.S.C. § 10102 (the Army reserve is “to provide trained units and qualified persons available for active duty in the armed forces, in time of war or national emergency”).”
Min v. Avila, 991 S.W.2d 495 (Tex. App. 1999). “10 U.S.C. § 10102 (1994) (emphasis added).”
Willenbring v. Neurauter, 48 M.J. 152 (C.A.A.F. 1998). “See 10 USC § 10102 . During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, over 245,000 reservists were called to active duty.”
Warren v. Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp., 358 F. Supp. 2d 301 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “See 10 U.S.C. § 10102 . Here, Warren participated in weekend training, referred to as "drills” on the United States Army website, as well as annual training of approximately two weeks a year.”
Santiago v. Rumsfeld, 407 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2005). “” 10 U.S.C. § 10102 . Nor do they dispute that “[i]n time of national emergency declared by the President .”
Doe v. Rumsfeld, 435 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2006). “” 10 U.S.C. § 10102 . As such, the National Guard of the United States may be “ordered to active duty and retained as long as so needed” at times when Congress determines that “more units and organization are needed for the national security than are in the regular components of…”
Santiago v. Rumsfeld, 425 F.3d 549 (9th Cir. 2005). “” 10 U.S.C. § 10102 . Nor do they dispute that “[i]n time of national emergency declared by the President .”
Strahler v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022). “See 10 U.S.C. §§ 10102 , 10141. 7 Plaintiff states, without any citation to the record, that Mr.”
Oklahoma State of v. Biden (W.D. Okla. 2021). “” 10 U.S.C. § 10102 . Because of the availability of the Guard for emergency response, Guard units and their members can be, and have been, deployed domestically with little or no notice.”
Santiago v. Rumsfeld (9th Cir. 2005). “” 10 U.S.C. § 10102 . Nor do they dispute that “[i]n time of national emer- gency declared by the President .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.