10 U.S.C. § 1374

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, § 1662(k)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3006]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1973–1974 · leading case: Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300 (Ct. Cl. 1973).
Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300 (Ct. Cl. 1973). “This element of plaintiff’s claim also fails as a matter of law. Finally, plaintiff’s claim must fail because it is barred by the statute of limitations.”
Pfister v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 459 (Ct. Cl. 1974). “Plaintiff’s transfer to the retired Reserve in the *468 grade of lieutenant colonel was pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1374 (a) (1964), which provides in pertinent part: * * * [A] reserve commissioned officer who is recommended for promotion to a higher reserve grade * * * and who,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.