10 U.S.C. § 2409a
Renumbered § 4702]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1991–2003 · leading case: William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996).
William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996). “The DLA’s authority to take this action came from former 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994).”
Hutson v. Analytic Sciences Corp., 860 F. Supp. 6 (D. Mass. 1994). “§ 2409 (a); Title 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(b). Although the plaintiff has not cited any comparable provisions in Massachusetts law, federal policy with respect to national defense by its very nature is not limited to merely federal concerns.”
Pacheco v. Raytheon Co., 777 F. Supp. 1089 (D.R.I. 1991). “1485 , 1616 (1990) (codified at 10 U.S.C.A. § 2409a (West Supp. 1991)), which governs certain defense contracts awarded after May 5, 1991.”
Micalizzi v. Rumsfeld, 247 F. Supp. 2d 556 (D. Vt. 2003). “After his discharge Micalizzi filed an administrative complaint against Merlin with the Department of Defense (“DOD”), pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994), which prohibited discrimination against defense contractor whistle-blowers.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(b) — 3 cases
Hutson v. Analytic Sciences Corp., 860 F. Supp. 6 (D. Mass. 1994). “§ 2409 (a); Title 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(b). Although the plaintiff has not cited any comparable provisions in Massachusetts law, federal policy with respect to national defense by its very nature is not limited to merely federal concerns.”
William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996). “The DLA’s authority to take this action came from former 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994).”
Micalizzi v. Rumsfeld, 247 F. Supp. 2d 556 (D. Vt. 2003). “After his discharge Micalizzi filed an administrative complaint against Merlin with the Department of Defense (“DOD”), pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994), which prohibited discrimination against defense contractor whistle-blowers.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(c)(1) — 1 case
William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996). “The DLA’s authority to take this action came from former 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(c)(4) — 1 case
William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996). “The DLA’s authority to take this action came from former 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(c)(5) — 1 case
William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996). “The DLA’s authority to take this action came from former 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(e)(1) — 1 case
William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996). “The DLA’s authority to take this action came from former 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(e)(2) — 1 case
William G. Tadlock Constr., Petitioner, v. United States Dep't of Def., Respondent, 91 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir. 1996). “The DLA’s authority to take this action came from former 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2409a(l) — 1 case
Micalizzi v. Rumsfeld, 247 F. Supp. 2d 556 (D. Vt. 2003). “After his discharge Micalizzi filed an administrative complaint against Merlin with the Department of Defense (“DOD”), pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2409a (1988 ed. Supp. V, 1993) (repealed 1994), which prohibited discrimination against defense contractor whistle-blowers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.