10 U.S.C. § 3401

DEFINITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

“In this title:“(1) The term ‘naval petroleum reserves’ has the meaning given the term in section 7420(2) [now 8720(2)] of title 10, United States Code.“(2) The term ‘Naval Petroleum Reserve Numbered 2’ means the naval petroleum reserve, commonly referred to as the Buena Vista unit, that is located in Kern County, California, and was established by Executive order of the President, dated December 13, 1912.“(3) The term ‘Naval Petroleum Reserve Numbered 3’ means the naval petroleum reserve, commonly referred to as the Teapot Dome unit, that is located in the State of Wyoming and was established by Executive order of the President, dated April 30, 1915.“(4) The term ‘Oil Shale Reserve Numbered 2’ means the naval petroleum reserve that is located in the State of Utah and was established by Executive order of the President, dated December 6, 1916.“(5) The term ‘antitrust laws’ has the meaning given the term in section 1(a) of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12(a)), except that the term also includes—“(A) the Act of June 19, 1936 (15 U.S.C. 13 et seq.; commonly known as the Robinson-Patman Act); and“(B) section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45), to the extent that such section applies to unfair methods of competition.“(6) The term ‘petroleum’ has the meaning given the term in section 7420(3) [now 8720(3)] of title 10, United States Code.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Red River Sci. & Tech., LLC v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Red River Sci. & Tech., LLC v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2025). · cites it 2× “” See 10 U.S.C. §§ 3401 (2), 3403, 3406(a)(1). A task order contract is a “contract for services” that provides for service orders instead of “procur[ing] or specify[ing] a firm quantity of services.”

Wsp USA Solutions Inc. v. Sec'y of the Army (Fed. Cir. 2025). “”)); see also 10 U.S.C. § 3401 (b). That is, a re- quirements contract, does not, on its own, create any obli- gations for the contracting parties to perform the contracted tasks or remit compensation for such perfor- mance.”

Siemens Gov't Tech., Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2025). “FASA neither defines ‘proposed issuance,’ see 10 U.S.C. § 3401 , nor seemingly has the Federal Circuit defined the phrase.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.