10 U.S.C. § 682

Renumbered § 12314]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[renumbered]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2009 · leading case: Peoples v. United States, 87 Fed. Cl. 553 (Fed. Cl. 2009).
Peoples v. United States, 87 Fed. Cl. 553 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “10 U.S.C. § 682 (a). However, if such a lieutenant “is eligible for retirement under any provision of law,” he or she should “be retired under that law .”
Loeh v. United States, 99 F. App'x 902 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “1 In his suit, he sought a change in his service records to show that by March 24, 1998, he had twice failed to be promoted to the rank of commander and therefore qualified for payment of separation pay in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 682 (a)(1). Alternatively, he asked the court…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.