10 U.S.C. § 924a

Art. 124a. Bribery

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Asking, Accepting, or Receiving Thing of Value.—Any person subject to this chapter—(1) who occupies an official position or who has official duties; and(2) who wrongfully asks, accepts, or receives a thing of value with the intent to have the person’s decision or action influenced with respect to an official matter in which the United States is interested;shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.(b)Promising, Offering, or Giving Thing of Value.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully promises, offers, or gives a thing of value to another person, who occupies an official position or who has official duties, with the intent to influence the decision or action of the other person with respect to an official matter in which the United States is interested, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, § 5437, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2952.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: United States v. Jones & Starr, ARMY MISC 20250182 (A.C.C.A. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Jones & Starr, ARMY MISC 20250182 (A.C.C.A. 2025). · cites it 2× “10 U.S.C. §924a. So, in addition to not being bound by the PHO’s findings and recommendations, the OSTC is similarly not bound by the chain of command recommendations.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.