10 U.S.C. § 953

Remission or suspension of sentence; restoration to duty; reenlistment

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

For offenders who were at the time of commission of their offenses subject to his authority and who merit such action, the Secretary concerned shall establish—(1) a system for the remission or suspension of the unexecuted part of the sentences of selected offenders;(2) a system for the restoration to duty of such offenders who have had the unexecuted part of their sentences remitted or suspended and who have not been discharged; and(3) a system for the enlistment of such offenders who have had the unexecuted part of their sentences remitted and who have been discharged.(Added Pub. L. 90–377, § 1, July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 287.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: United States v. Hutchins, 72 M.J. 294 (C.A.A.F. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Hutchins, 72 M.J. 294 (C.A.A.F. 2013). · cites it 6× “First, the Secretary of the Navy’s authority to commute, remit, or suspend all or part of a sentence is found in Articles 71 and 74, UCMJ, as well as in 10 U.S.C. § 953 (2006). In the present case, the record is not clear whether the exercise or failure to exercise clemency in…”

United States v. Olinger, 45 M.J. 644 (N.M.C.C.A. 1997). · cites it 3× “§ 874 , or through a Secretarial “system” pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 953 . It is clear from paragraph 3 of the SECNAVINST that the NCPB is the “system” established by the Secretary of the Navy pursuant to 10 U.”

United States v. Pena, 61 M.J. 776 (A.F.C.C.A. 2005). “10 U.S.C. § 953 . It is apparent from the legislation enacted in 10 U.”

United States v. Kinney, 22 M.J. 872 (1986). “§ 874 as well as under 10 U.S.C. § 953 (1982). See generally, Senate Report No.”

United States v. Cabble, 38 M.J. 654 (1993). “See also 10 U.S.C. § 953 (directs service secretaries to establish, as part of correctional program, a system for suspending sentences); United States v.”

United States v. Hutchins (N.M.C.C.A. 2018). · cites it 2× “74 Clemency is available to service members primarily through three statutory avenues: Article 60, UCMJ; Article 74, UCMJ; and 10 U.S.C. § 953 . Article 60, UCMJ, requires a CA to consider matters an accused submits in clemency before taking action on the findings and sentence…”

United States v. Hutchins (C.A.A.F. 2013). · cites it 3× “First, the Secretary of the Navy’s authority to commute, remit, or suspend all or part of a sentence is found in Articles 71 and 74, UCMJ, as well as in 10 U.S.C. § 953 (2006). In the present case, the record is not clear whether the exercise or failure to exercise clemency in…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.