11 U.S.C. § 1520
Effects of recognition of a foreign main proceeding
Section effective 180 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 79
cases (22 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: In re Ace Track Co.
In re Ace Track Co. (2016)
“” 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (a)(1), As a result, and as expressly authorized by paragraph 5 of the Recognition Order, the day after the Recognition Order was entered, the Foreign Representative moved for relief from the stay to continue the VPI Arbitration.”
Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. Krys (2013)
“Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1520 , recognition of the BVI liquidation as a foreign main proceeding imposed an automatic stay on any other proceedings against Sentry in the United States—including the derivative action brought by Morning Mist.”
Krys v. Farnum Place, LLC (2014)
“Because we conclude that the sale of the SIPA claims is a “transfer of an interest of the debtor in property that is within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (a)(2), and therefore the sale is subject to review under section 363, and comity is…”
Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP v. Barnet (2013)
“Nor does Drawbridge argue that it is affected by the automatic relief provided for in 11 U.S.C. § 1520 . 2 See Morning Mist Holdings Ltd.”
O'Sullivan v. Loy (2010)
“render void) a transfer by Debtor Jonathan Loy of his United States property under 11 U.S.C. §§ 1520 (a)(2) and 549(a)(1) because the transfer occurred prior to the commencement of the Chapter 15 bankruptcy case.”
Micron Technology, Inc. v. Qimonda AG (In Re Qimonda AG Bankruptcy Litigation) (2010)
“” 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (a). Yet, § 1521 provides a nonexclusive list of additional relief that may, in the discretion of a bankruptcy court, be granted “where necessary to effectuate the purpose of [Chapter 15] and to protect the assets of the debtor or the interests of the creditor.”
In Re: RCS Capital Development v. (2013)
“We must determine whether the Australian insolvency proceeding should be recognized as a foreign main proceeding under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, and whether the debt- or’s fully-encumbered property in the United States is subject to the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. §…”
In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd. (2015)
“§ 363 was not mandatory because 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (a)(3) provided that a foreign representative may exercise the rights and powers under section 363, (ii) the entrustment power granted under 11 U.”
In re Agrokor D.D. (2018)
“%20%C2%A7%201520"> 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (a) ("Upon recognition of a foreign proceeding that is a foreign main proceeding- (1) sections 361 and 362 apply with respect to .”
In Re Atlas Shipping A/S (2009)
“11 U.S.C. § 1520 (a)(2). Section 1520 also allows a foreign representative to operate a debtor’s business by exercising the rights and powers of a trustee under sections 363 and 552; and it applies § 552 to property of the debtor that is within the territorial jurisdiction of…”
In Re Abc Learning Centres Ltd. (2011)
“” 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (a)(1). The imposition of an automatic stay upon recognition of a foreign main proceeding is necessary to ensure that the goals of Chapter 15 — including cooperation between U.”
In Re Tri-Continental Exchange Ltd. (2006)
“agination" label="633"> *633 in As to the objection by creditor Bennett Truck that the case should only be recognized as a “foreign nonmain proceeding,” the battle is over whether the foreign representatives will have the benefits of the effects of recognition of a “foreign main…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.