12 U.S.C. § 1138d

Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1941–1997 · leading case: United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997). · cites it 2× “) (making a "material statement"); and 12 U. S. C. § 1138d(a) (1946 ed.) (making a "material representation").”
Krulewitch v. United States, 336 U.S. 440 (1949). · cites it 2× “12 U.S.C. § 1138d (f), Conspiracy involving Farm Credit Banks, Administration, etc.”
United States v. Halbrook, 36 F. Supp. 345 (E.D. Mo. 1941). · cites it 4× “Defendants have filed what they designate as a "Plea in Bar", in which it is requested that this court set aside said indictment and discharge defendants, for the reason that said defendants have previously been tried in this court and acquitted on an indictment charging them…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1138d(a) — 1 case
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997). “) (making a "material statement"); and 12 U. S. C. § 1138d(a) (1946 ed.) (making a "material representation").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.