12 U.S.C. § 1747c

Rent schedules

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary shall require that the rents for the dwellings in any project insured under this subchapter shall be established in accordance with a rent schedule approved by the Secretary, and that the investor shall not charge or collect rents for any dwellings in the project in excess of the appropriate rents therefor as shown in the latest rent schedule approved pursuant to this section. Prior to approving the initial or any subsequent rent schedule pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall find that such schedule affords reasonable assurance that the rents to be established thereunder are (1) not lower than necessary, together with all other income to be derived from or in connection with the project, to produce reasonably stable revenues sufficient to provide for the payment of the operating expenses, the minimum annual amortization charge, and the minimum annual return; and (2) not higher than necessary to meet the need for dwellings for families of moderate income.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1969–2004 · leading case: Christopher Vill., Ltd. P'ship v. Retsinas, 190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999).
Christopher Vill., Ltd. P'ship v. Retsinas, 190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999). · cites it 4× “, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1747c (West 1989). 3 If rental revenues fail to cover these costs, an *313 owner can request a rental increase from HUD.”
Christopher Vill., L.P. & Wilshire Investments Corp. v. United States, 360 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “”); see also 12 U.S.C. § 1747c (2000) (“[T]he investor shall not charge or collect rents for any dwellings in the project in excess of the appropriate rents therefor as shown in the latest rent schedule approved pursuant to this section.”
Stoneridge Apts., Co. v. Lindsay, 303 F. Supp. 677 (S.D.N.Y. 1969). · cites it 2× “The presence of federal government insurance carries with it rent schedules pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1747c, which states: “The Secretary shall require that the rents for the dwellings in any project insured under this subchapter shall be established in accordance with a rent…”
In Re Pleasant East Assocs., 286 B.R. 509 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2002). “” See 12 U.S.C.A. § 1747c. Thus, the HUD reimbursement scheme resembles cost-plus contracts or public utility regulation, in either of which situations the private party who performs the work is assured of recovering reasonably incurred costs as well as a reasonable return on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.