12 U.S.C. § 3

DEFINITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar
“For the purposes of this Act:“(a)Bank Holding Company.—The term ‘bank holding company’ has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841).“(b)Savings and Loan Holding Company.—The term ‘savings and loan holding company’ has the same meaning as in section 10(a) of the Home Owners’ Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a(a)).”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–2019 · leading case: City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc.
City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc. (2009) ohnd “, the Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act, 12 U.S.C. § 3 801, et seq., the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.”
King v. Alaska State Housing Authority (1973) alaska “4, § 2 of the Urban Renewal Handbook of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Federal regulations are pertinent since the redevelopment offer contemplated the construction of housing under the Section 236 program of the National Housing Act, 12 U.”
United States v. Wooten (1992) cma “The defense position is that such records are inadmissible because they were obtained in violation of the Right to Financial Privacy Act, 12 USC § 3 )01 et seq., and AR 190-6, Obtaining Information from Financial Institutions (15 Jan 82).”
Jones v. Department of the Air Force (1996) cod “12 in the context of 12 U.S.C. § 3 )08, R.F.P.A. Claim three—Validity of DODD 13)).”
Sealed Case (PUBLIC REDACTED OPINION) (2019) cadc “12 U.S.C. § 3 105(d)(1). The Federal Reserve, in turn, has authority to “impose such conditions on its approval” of a foreign bank’s application “as it deems necessary,” Id.”
Nickerson v. TD Bank (2015) mesuperct “The motion also argues that tile allegations in the Compl11int contain insufficient specificity regarding when and/or if TD Bank received the recorded mortgage release from the registry of deeds, and "merely alleges threadb11re conclusions with a fonnulaic recitation of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.