12 U.S.C. § 3415
Cost reimbursement
Except for records obtained pursuant to section 3403(d) or 3413(a) through (h) of this title, or as otherwise provided by law, a Government authority shall pay to the financial institution assembling or providing financial records pertaining to a customer and in accordance with procedures established by this chapter a fee for reimbursement for such costs as are reasonably necessary and which have been directly incurred in searching for, reproducing, or transporting books, papers, records, or other data required or requested to be produced. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall, by regulation, establish the rates and conditions under which such payment may be made.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2014 · leading case: Pittsburgh Nat'l Bank v. United States, 771 F.2d 73 (3rd Cir. 1985).
Pittsburgh Nat'l Bank v. United States, 771 F.2d 73 (3rd Cir. 1985). “PNB therefore claimed that it was entitled to reimbursement pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3415 . The government, on the other hand, maintained that the unpaid invoices related to the costs of producing the financial records of American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc.”
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In Camera, 636 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1981). “PER CURIAM: In this appeal we are required to determine 1) whether a district court order denying reimbursement of costs of complying with a grand jury subpoena is an appealable order; and 2) whether 12 U.S.C. § 3415 (Supp. III 1979) requires reimbursement for costs incurred in…”
Preston State Bank, F/K/A Dallas City Bank v. Roach, John, in His Off. Capacity as Collin Cnty. DA, & Collin Cnty., Texas, 443 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App. 2014). “§ 3411 (2014) (duty of financial institutions to comply with government request for financial records); 12 U.S.C. § 3415 (2014) (providing in relevant part that “a Government authority shall pay to the financial institution assembling or providing financial records pertaining to…”
Inspector Gen. of the United States Dep't of Agric. v. Great Lakes Bancorp, 825 F. Supp. 790 (E.D. Mich. 1993). “under section 3402(2) only if: (1) there is reason to believe that the records sought are relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry, and (2) a copy of the subpena or summons has been served upon the customer with a notice which states with reasonable specificity the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.