12 U.S.C. § 3418

Injunctive relief

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to any other remedy contained in this chapter, injunctive relief shall be available to require that the procedures of this chapter are complied with. In the event of any successful action, costs together with reasonable attorney’s fees as determined by the court may be recovered.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1995–2012 · leading case: Aneke v. American Express Travel Related Services, Inc.
Aneke v. American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. (2012) dcd “12 U.S.C. § 3418 . Plaintiffs do not dispute that, under the Arbitration Provision, they may individually pursue RFPA’s civil and injunctive remedies in arbitration proceedings.”
McDonough v. Widnall (1995) cod “That jurisdiction flows from 12 U.S.C. § 3418 which states: In addition to any other remedy contained in this chapter, injunctive relief shall be available to require that the procedures of this chapter are complied with.”
Botero-Zea v. United States (1996) nysd · cites it 2× “Plaintiff Fernando Botero-Zea, a citizen and resident of the Republic of Colombia has moved, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3418 , for a preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Government (“the Government”), as well as all of its agents and employees, [1] from violating his…”
Chang v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2000) tned · cites it 2× “Chang’s motions to prevent access to financial records, to quash administrative subpoena and his motions for injunctive relief, 1 attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3418 [Docs. 1, 10 and 11 in 3:99-MC-29, Docs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.