14 U.S.C. § 1
DESIGNATION.
“The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the ‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1943–2024 · leading case: United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987).
United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987). “For example, the FAA and the United States Armed Services have an established working relationship that provides for FAA participation in numerous military activities.”
United States v. Frank Gunnar Williams, 617 F.2d 1063 (5th Cir. 1980). “” 14 U.S.C.A. § 1 . See Maul v. United States, 274 U.”
United States v. Janssen, 73 M.J. 221 (C.A.A.F. 2014). “Except when it operates as a service in the Navy, see 14 U.S.C. § 1 (2012), which it has not done since World War II.”
Halverson, Paul D. v. Slater, Rodney E., 129 F.3d 180 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “931 (1966) (codified as amended at 14 U.S.C. § 1 ). The Transportation Secretary subsequently delegated his GLPA responsibilities to the Commandant of *183 the Coast Guard, with whom they remained until December 1995.”
Spehr v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 69 (Fed. Cl. 2001). “14 U.S.C. § 1 . . The Military Pay Act provides, inter alia, that ”[t]he following persons are entitled to the basic pay of the pay grade [applicable to them], in accordance with their years of service____ — a member of a uniformed service who is on active duly.”
United States v. Carpenter, 37 M.J. 291 (1993). “officers and employees of the Department of Transportation," of which the Coast Guard is a part ( 14 USC § 1 ), without Senate confirmation.”
United States v. John Walter Piner & Salvatore Joseph Gallina, 608 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1979). “14 U.S.C. § 1 . . It appears from the record that in 1977, 330,-534 pleasure craft were registered in the San Francisco Bay area and 3,245 were boarded by the Coast Guard, of which 40 percent were found not to be in compliance with safety regulations.”
Doyle v. United States, 441 F. Supp. 701 (D.S.C. 1977). “4 (See, 14 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 , 83 and 85 (Supp. 1977)).”
In Re W. States Wholesale Nat. Gas Anti. Litig., 368 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (D. Nev. 2005). “Texas-Ohio claims that Defendants violated the Sherman Act, 14 U.S.C. § 1 , the Cartwright Act, and California Unfair Competition Laws, Cal.”
United States v. Roger Aarons & Robert Swann, 310 F.2d 341 (2d Cir. 1962). “Although the Coast Guard is “a military service”, 14 U.S.C. § 1 , the military is excluded from the definition of “agency” only to a limited degree, and even then “except as to the requirements of section 3.”
In Re Texas City Disaster Litig., 197 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1952). “The findings of the district court do not specifically relate to any employee of the United States any particular negligent or wrongful act or omission not within one of the exceptions to the Act.”
Jacque Bunting, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Harold Dierich v. United States, 884 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1989). “We find the statutory authority of the Coast Guard in 14 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. One of the primary duties of the Coast Guard is to operate rescue facilities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.