14 U.S.C. § 2
REFERENCES.
“Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 63
cases, 1957–2018 · leading case: United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987).
United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987). “See 14 U. S. C. §§ 2 , 88(a)(1). [12] There is no dispute that Johnson's injury arose directly out of the rescue mission, or that the mission was an activity incident to his military service.”
Thames Shipyard & Repair Co. v. United States, 350 F.3d 247 (1st Cir. 2003). “, 14 U.S.C. § 2 ("Primary Duties") (stating, inter alia, that the Coast Guard "shall administer laws and promulgate and enforce regulations for the promotion of safety of life and property on and under the high seas and waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States…”
In Re City of New York v. Agni, 522 F.3d 279 (2d Cir. 2008). “14 U.S.C. § 2 . The Coast Guard has promulgated a pilothouse watch regulation providing that “[i]n addition to the licensed deck officer or pilot, there shall be at least one member of the crew on watch in or near the pilothouse at all times when the vessel is being navigated.”
Sanchez v. Sessions, 904 F.3d 643 (9th Cir. 2017). “" 14 U.S.C. § 2 (1). This includes enforcing all applicable provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA").”
United States v. Frank Gunnar Williams, 617 F.2d 1063 (5th Cir. 1980). “” 14 U.S.C.A. § 2 . Section 89(a) of Title 14 affords blanket authority to “make inquiries, examinations, inspections, searches, seizures, and arrests upon the high seas .”
United States v. Steve Kent Odneal, United States of Am. v. John Louis Ribando, George M. Challman Iii, & Harold Louis Bennett, 565 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1977). “under the circumstances, justified in detaining the vessel preparatory to boarding her, and (2) was the customs officer justified in participating in the detention? The Coast Guard is granted very broad statutory authority to enforce and to assist in the enforcement of all…”
Inlandboatmen's Union of the Pac. v. Dep't of Transp., 836 P.2d 823 (Wash. 1992). “7 The ferry system argues that the statement of the primary duties of the Coast Guard found in 14 U.S.C. § 2 is an explicit statement of Congress' intent to preempt state regulation.”
Kelly v. Keystone Shipping Co., 281 F. Supp. 2d 313 (D. Mass. 2003). “” 14 U.S.C. § 2 . Regulation 12.13-1 therefore falls within the reach of section 53.”
Chao v. Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc., 534 U.S. 235 (2002). “” 14 U. S. C. §2 (2000 ed.). Under this provision, the Coast Guard possesses authority to promulgate and enforce regulations promoting the safety of vessels anchored in state navigable waters, such as Rig 52.”
Laurence F. Kelly, as Adm'r of the Est. of Richard C. Kelly v. United States, 531 F.2d 1144 (2d Cir. 1976). “” 14 U.S.C. § 2 . With regard to rescue operations specifically the Coast Guard is authorized, though not obligated, “to render aid to distressed persons, vessels, and aircraft on and under the high seas and on and under the waters over which the *1148 United States has…”
Rocco P. Digiovanni, Jr. v. Traylor Bros., Inc., 959 F.2d 1119 (1st Cir. 1992). “See 14 U.S.C. § 2 ; Dougherty v. Santa Fe Marine Inc.”
United States v. Terry Wayne Hilton A/K/A Wayne Milton, William J. Baggett & Andrew N. Stover, 619 F.2d 127 (1st Cir. 1980). “The government’s interests in being able to conduct discretionary safety inspections of its flag vessels have a similar degree of importance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.