15 U.S.C. § 106
PRESERVATION PROVISIONS.
“(a)State Law.—Nothing in this title shall affect the jurisdiction or regulatory authority of the insurance commissioner (or any agency or office performing like functions) of any State over any insurer or other person—“(1) except as specifically provided in this title; and“(2) except that—“(A) the definition of the term ‘act of terrorism’ in section 102 shall be the exclusive definition of that term for purposes of compensation for insured losses under this title, and shall preempt any provision of State law that is inconsistent with that definition, to the extent that such provision of law would otherwise apply to any type of insurance covered by this title;“(B) during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 26, 2002] and ending on December 31, 2003, rates and forms for terrorism risk insurance covered by this title and filed with any State shall not be subject to prior approval or a waiting period under any law of a State that would otherwise be applicable, except that nothing in this title affects the ability of any State to invalidate a rate as excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory, and, with respect to forms, where a State has prior approval authority, it shall apply to allow subsequent review of such forms; and“(C) during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and for so long as the Program is in effect, as provided in section 108, including authority in subsection 108(b), books and records of any insurer that are relevant to the Program shall be provided, or caused to be provided, to the Secretary, upon request by the Secretary, notwithstanding any provision of the laws of any State prohibiting or limiting such access.“(b)Existing Reinsurance Agreements.—Nothing in this title shall be construed to alter, amend, or expand the terms of coverage under any reinsurance agreement in effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 26, 2002]. The terms and conditions of such an agreement shall be determined by the language of that agreement.
Notes of Decisions
Vibroplex Co. v. J. H. Bunnell & Co., 23 F.2d 490 (2d Cir. 1928).
“, destruction, section 20 (15 USCA § 100) and exclusion from import, section 27 (15 USCA § 106). So far as tho fact is material at all that the vibrators had two names, “Vibroplex” and “Bug,” it seems to us to make in the defendant’s favor.”
S. S. Kresge Co. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 194 (Cust. Ct. 1950).
“The following rulings have been issued in connection with section 27 of the trade-mark act of February 20, 1905 ( 15 U. S. C. § 106 , now 15 U. S. C. § 1124 ), which prohibits the entry of any article which bears a Dame or mark calculated to induce the public into believing that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.