15 U.S.C. § 1101
SHORT TITLE.
“This title [this note] may be cited as the ‘Global Climate Protection Act of 1987’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1987–2020 · leading case: United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera, 853 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera, 853 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2017). “15- 10615 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43), and thus triggered the “8-level enhancement pursuant to U.”
Celtic Life Ins. Co. v. McLendon, 814 So. 2d 222 (Ala. 2001). “She argues that the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., operating in tandem with Ala.”
Am. Bankers Ins. v. Inman, 436 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2006). “pursuant to the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 28, 2003, Appellee Jack In-man was injured when the motorcycle that he was riding was struck from behind by another driver whose liability insurance coverage was…”
In re Residential Capital, LLC, 497 B.R. 720 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013). “First, citing the MeCarran-Ferguson Act (“MFA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., the Investor Objecting Parties argued that the Rehabilitation Court, not this Court, has the exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the Settlement Agreement is fair and equitable to FGIC…”
Donelon v. Louisiana Div. of Admin. Law, 522 F.3d 564 (5th Cir. 2008). “The McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1101 , et seq. reserves insurance regulation to the states.”
McDermott Inernational, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters of London, 120 F.3d 583 (5th Cir. 1997). “22:629 — which, if triggered, renders arbitra *586 tion clauses in insurance policies null and void — is not preempted by the Convention because the McCarran-Ferguson Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq.) insulates state regulation of insurance from federal preemption.”
Logan v. Credit Gen. Ins. Co. (In Re PRS Ins. Grp.), 294 B.R. 609 (Bankr. D. Del. 2003). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1101 , et seq. B. Reserve Preemption The McCarran-Ferguson Act provides that: “[n]o Act of Congress shall be construed to invalidate, impair, or supersede any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance, or which imposes a fee…”
Leuthner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ne Pa, 270 F. Supp. 2d 584 (M.D. Penn. 2003). “33 , as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. Plaintiffs’ Brief in Opposition was submitted prior to the Miller holding, which enumerated new factors, utilized herein, that courts should examine to determine whether ERISA preemption is warranted.”
Bowler v. Hawke, 320 F.3d 59 (1st Cir. 2003). “, the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945, 15 U.S.C. § 1101 (recognizing this practice and declaring it to be in the public interest), the GLBA includes a number of provisions specifying whether and how much it preempts otherwise applicable state insurance laws.”
Prop. Cas. Insurers Ass'n of Am. v. Donovan, 66 F. Supp. 3d 1018 (N.D. Ill. 2014). “15 U.S.C. § 1101 ; see also Autry v. Northwest Premium Seros.”
Pulley v. Legreide (In Re Pulley), 295 B.R. 28 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2003). “17-30C-1 et seqi). Because of the interim nature of the facility, however, initiating proceedings under that law is not in the best interests of the facility’s policyholders and other claimants under the policies *41 written by it.”
Sparkes v. Morrison & Foerster Long-Term Disability Ins. Plan, 129 F. Supp. 2d 182 (N.D.N.Y. 2001). “2 If this so-called “common sense” test is met, courts then look to the case law interpreting the phrase “business of insurance” under the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., for guidance in interpreting the saving clause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.