15 U.S.C. § 1901
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, § 7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases, 1975–2007 · leading case: Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985).
Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985). “947 , as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1901 et seq. [19] 86 Stat. 1207 , as amended, 15 U.”
Miller v. Todd, 551 N.E.2d 1139 (Ind. 1990). “" 15 U.S.C.A. § 1901 (14) (West 1982). [3] A number of jurisdictions have followed this method of determining liability.”
Mitchell v. White Motor Credit Corp., 627 F. Supp. 1241 (M.D. Tenn. 1986). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1901 (15) (1982). 11 . Section 408(a) of the Act, 15 U.”
Slaymaker v. Westgate State Bank, 739 P.2d 444 (Kan. 1987). “Plaintiff recovered actual damages of $3,500 under the provisions of the federal Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 15 U.S.C.§ 1901 et seq. (1982). 15 U.S.C.”
Turi Caiazzo & Frank Caiazzo v. Volkswagenwerk A. G., & Volkswagen of Am., Inc., Bruce Beard Volkswagen, Inc. & James Valentine, 647 F.2d 241 (2d Cir. 1981). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1901 (14). Coincidentally, the Caiazzos’ reconstruction expert, William Steiglitz, is credited with coining the term “crashworthiness" in a paper he presented at the Institute of Aeronautical Sciences in 1950.”
Orca Bay Seafoods v. Nw. Truck Sales, Inc. Kamco, Inc., an Oklahoma Corp., 32 F.3d 433 (9th Cir. 1994). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1901 (1), (15). It defined “motor vehicle” in a way which includes large trucks: The term “motor vehicle” means any vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power manufactured primarily for use on the public streets, roads, and highways, except any vehicle operated…”
Ex Parte Warren, 548 So. 2d 157 (Ala. 1989). “Jim Skinner points out that the United States Congress has enacted laws that regulate the effects of the manufacture, distribution, financing, warranty, and sale of motor vehicles in interstate commerce, and it directs our attention to *162 the following: the Motor Vehicle…”
Tye v. Spitzer-Dodge, 499 F. Supp. 687 (S.D. Ohio 1980). “Tye had stated sufficient facts for finding a possible violation of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. The plaintiff thereafter filed her amended complaint asserting a cause of action under the above statute.”
True v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc., 520 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (C.D. Cal. 2007). “But 15 U.S.C. § 1901 regulates in this field only to the extent of requiring display of a vehicle’s fuel efficiency on a label affixed upon a vehicle and provision of an information booklet with comparative fuel efficiency ratings.”
Bih-Jing Jeng v. Witters, 452 F. Supp. 1349 (M.D. Penn. 1978). “See, 15 U.S.C. § 1901 (14). The term “second collision”, as used in definitions of crashworthiness of a motor vehicle in products liability cases generally refers to the collision of the passenger with the interior part of the automobile after the initial impact or collision.”
Wilson v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 445 F. Supp. 1368 (E.D. Va. 1978). “15 U.S.C. § 1901 (14). Crash-worthiness has similarly been defined as “the relative ability of an automobile to protect its passengers during the second collision.”
Mataya v. Behm Motors, Inc., 409 F. Supp. 65 (E.D. Wis. 1976). “This is an action brought under the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (“the Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1901 — 1991. Before the Court are motions by the plaintiff and certain defendants, as are described more fully herein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.